cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
rslade
Influencer II

Blockchain voting?

The US postal service has filed a patent on a blockchain voting method.

 

Bruce Schneier has pointed at some of the pieces noting that this is an at best stupid, and at worst dangerous, idea.

 

Repeat after me: blockchain is not the answer.


............

Other posts: https://community.isc2.org/t5/forums/recentpostspage/user-id/1324864413

This message may or may not be governed by the terms of
http://www.noticebored.com/html/cisspforumfaq.html#Friday or
https://blogs.securiteam.com/index.php/archives/1468
7 Replies
TomasP
Reader I

Agreed 100% (I don't think many in this community will back blockchain for voting).
In my view tech can help with counting/auditing votes but when casting it adds more problems than it solves.
CraginS
Defender I


@rslade wrote:

...

Repeat after me: blockchain is not the answer.


Blockchain is not the answer.

 

Craig

 

D. Cragin Shelton, DSc
Dr.Cragin@iCloud.com
My Blog
My LinkeDin Profile
My Community Posts
tmekelburg1
Community Champion

This reminds of a podcast I recently listened to called Solvable: Election Security is (mostly) Solvable. Malcolm Gladwell interviews Bruce Schneier and basically said it's a simple process to solve if we stop worrying about trying to make voting private.

 

Thoughts?

Would you be comfortable with others knowing how you voted?

Could it be used against you?

TomasP
Reader I

I don't think a "public" vote is ever acceptable. Can get dangerous, retaliatory, etc.
For example, I'm not from the US but with tensions already high I don't think a list of who voted republican or democrat would help, it would only put targets on people's backs.
rslade
Influencer II

> tmekelburg1 (Contributor I) posted a new reply in Industry News on 09-15-2020

>   Would you be comfortable with others
> knowing how you voted?

Me, personally? Yeah, but I'm not really personally invested in my own privacy,
since I have a massive awareness of my own insignificance.

> Could it be used against you?

Oh, absolutely. If anyone cared.

(Interesting coincidence, this. My next research project/presentation is on
differential privacy, and there are a lot of cross-overs ...)

====================== (quote inserted randomly by Pegasus Mailer)
rslade@gmail.com rmslade@outlook.com rslade@computercrime.org
As far as the laws of mathematics refer to reality, they are not
certain, and as far as they are certain, they do not refer to
reality. - Albert Einstein (1879-1955)
victoria.tc.ca/techrev/rms.htm http://twitter.com/rslade
http://blogs.securiteam.com/index.php/archives/author/p1/
https://community.isc2.org/t5/forums/recentpostspage/user-id/1324864413

............

Other posts: https://community.isc2.org/t5/forums/recentpostspage/user-id/1324864413

This message may or may not be governed by the terms of
http://www.noticebored.com/html/cisspforumfaq.html#Friday or
https://blogs.securiteam.com/index.php/archives/1468
GerryS
Contributor II

blockchain is not the answer

 

I can see any type of public voting being used against you, potential for a lot of intimidation and intended and unintended consequences.

tmekelburg1
Community Champion


@GerryS wrote:

blockchain is not the answer

 

I can see any type of public voting being used against you, potential for a lot of intimidation and intended and unintended consequences.


I can see it used against us as well but to be fair so can social media posts and other various things we post about ourselves online. It will be just another thing we lookup before we decide to interview Candidates lol (I kid of course but you know some hiring managers will want to know before the interview).