- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-12-2021
05:10 AM
05-12-2021
05:10 AM
CISSP Online Self-Paced Training
Can anybody please confirm if the current version of the online self paced Official (ISC)2 CBK Training Seminar for the CISSP is aligned with the newest version of the exam from May the 1st, 2021 ?
Labels
- Labels:
-
CISSP
4 Replies
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-12-2021
01:18 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-12-2021
01:22 PM
05-12-2021
01:22 PM
Thank you, I have already read it.
But does this update mean full alignment to the new CBK ?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-12-2021
03:03 PM
05-12-2021
03:03 PM
> CyberStudent (Viewer) posted a new reply in Exams on 05-12-2021 01:22 PM in the
> But does this update mean full alignment
> to the new CBK ?
[Sigh] [once again ...]
OK, look. The exam is based on a thorough understanding of the basic
*principles* of information security. Some specific and detailed content is also
tested, but those who are freaking out over whether the latest course, book, or set
of sample questions are "in full alignment" with the latest version of the CBK are
very much in danger of "majoring on the minors." Yes, the CBK is reviewed
every year, to make sure that, over time, it isn't accumulating irrelevant stuff, and
to make sure that any really significant developments (which almost never
happen) do get included.
I've just done a full review of my *own* seminar materials. In the process, I went
back and compared the materials with content and CBKs going back twenty years
and more. Know what? There just isn't that much that changes, since the
fundamentals don't change over time. Concentrate on those basics. The latest
blockchain implementation is just not going to be an issue.
======================
rslade@gmail.com rmslade@outlook.com rslade@computercrime.org
"If you do buy a computer, don't turn it on." - Richards' 2nd Law
"Robert Slade's Guide to Computer Viruses" 0-387-94663-2
"Viruses Revealed" 0-07-213090-3
"Software Forensics" 0-07-142804-6
"Dictionary of Information Security" Syngress 1-59749-115-2
"Cybersecurity Lessons from CoVID-19" CRC Press 978-0-367-68269-9
============= for back issues:
[Base URL] site http://victoria.tc.ca/techrev/
CISSP refs: [Base URL]mnbksccd.htm
PC Security: [Base URL]mnvrrvsc.htm
Security Dict.: [Base URL]secgloss.htm
Security Educ.: [Base URL]comseced.htm
Book reviews: [Base URL]mnbk.htm
[Base URL]review.htm
Partial/recent: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/techbooks/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Slade
https://is.gd/RotlWB http://twitter.com/rslade
http://blogs.securiteam.com/index.php/archives/author/p1/
............
Other posts: https://community.isc2.org/t5/forums/recentpostspage/user-id/1324864413
This message may or may not be governed by the terms of
http://www.noticebored.com/html/cisspforumfaq.html#Friday or
https://blogs.securiteam.com/index.php/archives/1468
> But does this update mean full alignment
> to the new CBK ?
[Sigh] [once again ...]
OK, look. The exam is based on a thorough understanding of the basic
*principles* of information security. Some specific and detailed content is also
tested, but those who are freaking out over whether the latest course, book, or set
of sample questions are "in full alignment" with the latest version of the CBK are
very much in danger of "majoring on the minors." Yes, the CBK is reviewed
every year, to make sure that, over time, it isn't accumulating irrelevant stuff, and
to make sure that any really significant developments (which almost never
happen) do get included.
I've just done a full review of my *own* seminar materials. In the process, I went
back and compared the materials with content and CBKs going back twenty years
and more. Know what? There just isn't that much that changes, since the
fundamentals don't change over time. Concentrate on those basics. The latest
blockchain implementation is just not going to be an issue.
======================
rslade@gmail.com rmslade@outlook.com rslade@computercrime.org
"If you do buy a computer, don't turn it on." - Richards' 2nd Law
"Robert Slade's Guide to Computer Viruses" 0-387-94663-2
"Viruses Revealed" 0-07-213090-3
"Software Forensics" 0-07-142804-6
"Dictionary of Information Security" Syngress 1-59749-115-2
"Cybersecurity Lessons from CoVID-19" CRC Press 978-0-367-68269-9
============= for back issues:
[Base URL] site http://victoria.tc.ca/techrev/
CISSP refs: [Base URL]mnbksccd.htm
PC Security: [Base URL]mnvrrvsc.htm
Security Dict.: [Base URL]secgloss.htm
Security Educ.: [Base URL]comseced.htm
Book reviews: [Base URL]mnbk.htm
[Base URL]review.htm
Partial/recent: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/techbooks/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Slade
https://is.gd/RotlWB http://twitter.com/rslade
http://blogs.securiteam.com/index.php/archives/author/p1/
............
Other posts: https://community.isc2.org/t5/forums/recentpostspage/user-id/1324864413
This message may or may not be governed by the terms of
http://www.noticebored.com/html/cisspforumfaq.html#Friday or
https://blogs.securiteam.com/index.php/archives/1468
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-12-2021
03:16 PM
05-12-2021
03:16 PM
Thank you, I appreciate your intent to help 😉
I failed it once already, so I'm considering the self-paced training for the next attempt.
Cheers