- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
@dcontesti wrote:
@Vigenere wrote:
Hello, today in the official CISSP app I have encountered the following question
Q: When you're designing a security system for Internet-delivered email, which of the following is least important?
- Nonrepudiation
- Availability
- Message Integrity
- Access restriction
How would you answer?WOW, I would say all four of them as important and would be hard pressed to choose one over the other.
In an exam situation, I probably would pick either a or b.
And given some consideration, non-repudiation on internet mail is also critical (I need some guarantee that the authenticity of the signature). So in my case, I probably would answer B.
I am going to suggest that this is just a bad question that 1) is not framed properly for the reader to choose, 2) may or may not have a valid reference and 3) may be subjective on the part of the reader.
Did you feedback to (ISC)2 that the question may be problematic?
Regards
d
You asked why I would choose Availability as my answer.
As the question is worded in MHO, I chose Availability.
Rationale:
Non-repudiation - even though it is about ensuring the signature (sender) is really about integrity
Message Integrity - goes without saying is also about integrity
Access restriction - again (in my mind) is another form of integrity. Ensuring that admins can restrict access to emails based on either IDs or IPs.
As stated, when I looked at the options, I was left with non-repudiation and availability. Given the question to me (again MHO) seemed to about integrity I chose Availability.
I did not mean to imply that I think it is the right answer but in an exam situation, given less than a minute to read and choose, that is the answer that I would pick.......
Hope that explains why I chose the way I did.
d