Is all this worry about AI's ability to create "fakes" not a variation of Aristotle's pondering of logic? A sound argument, whether it comes from 10-year-old, a Nobel prize winner, or an AI program is still a sound argument. Conversely, a false argument is false regardless of its source.
The problem here is not artificial intelligence; it is the limit of human intelligence. While throughout history we have witnessed intellectual atrocities as the mob was easily swayed by clever fakes, today we seem more susceptible than ever, as for decades now we've been conditioning ourselves to search-engine ranking and social media likes.
