No, or not particularly.
Sadly, most of human live under laws that tent to be flexible, or clarified beneficially to those who create them when they are employed.
To counter this, I think the way is not to treat the technology as AI per se, but regulate surveillance, require accountability form these using the system and when significant harm can be caused require human in the loop decision making.
What I think we're really hoping, betting on is that democracies where citizens who can understand these technologies and pros/cons and hold leaders to account do better over time than autocracies who even now have carte-blanche to do what they want - even building systems to generate conditional law on the fly.
Tailored, individualized law would be hugely over-policing and over enforcing, so no-one sensible should condone it.
