Hi There !
In conversations with corporate security leaders,
many of them say they would like to advance supply chain security measures.
Specifically, they are considering allocating a budget for activities.
(For example call on their contractors to set up organizations CSIRT.)
Naturally, contractors do not rely solely on orders from one company, so they will receive similar requests from multiple business partners.
Companies that first request a contractor to serve as a CSIRT will have to spend a lot of time transferring knowledge to the contractor, while companies that hire the contractor later will incur lower costs.
I wonder whether it would be a good idea or not to advise them,
"If you're keep costs down, Don’t touch the supply chain. wait for other company done."
Is this a good idea?
I want to hear everyone's opinions!!
thank you.
Cost is a key factor in decision-making, but compromising security can harm reputation. Every organization's leadership should establish benchmarks and standards to balance both security and cost effectively.
Contrators my design your CSIRT but I would never recommend that they run it.
IMHOO the members of the CSIRT should be in house staff (legal, HR, PR, IT, Security (IT and Physical), etc.)
A contractor may be able to best design it but only run it if they are actively part of staff.
Please check out this thread
Regards
d