I knew this was going to be a bad thing from day one, much like the internet whereby no policy is in place from day 1 with a new service and people want to abuse it and take advantage of it, ultimately for financial gain. I know openAI is supposed to be "open" but I there needs to be some kind of policy of usage, and any deviation from that needs to be enforced with some kind of disciplinary if its used to release something on the internet for malicious purposes.
I don't see this as an easy task, due to the openness of the whole thing, signing code for usage is fine for internal use but adopting this for public use is going to be a massive upheaval and was never intended to run as that from day 1 anyway. If openai has some kind of privacy mechanism to tie that code to a specific user, and a log of all code that was executed was logged and tracked and anything which is found to be "not fit for purpose" on a central server could flag that code up for review and if it goes against a disclaimer then the person or organisation could be fined. But its supposed to be open, and to do something like this we will have to be getting into the realms of checking for ID for banks and financial institutions.
I cant think of anything that will stop someone checking code with openai, copying that code and using it for a bad act. Disclaimers can always exist but it does not stop someone copying the code into a program. The solution to stop this is change openai to closed ai but that goes against the whole idea of openness.
