Not sure if this is the right forum, but I am very interested on the groups view point of FireEye Versus Palo Atlo's WildFire. To me it is a breakdown of cost and trying to balance spend in a multiple areas and not just one. FireEye is a great product but has I high cost. Spending to much in one area may leave your client vulnerable. I think you do need protection from four side: the firewall, Threat Intel (ATP), Advance End Point Protection and Data Protection. If you look at the Gartner reports they are both fighting in the same quadrant. Which product is better, is the argument of PC versus MAC, but want to get other professionals views on the subject. Your Thoughts?