Another term for User when referring to...Users?

[ericgeater]

Your post reminded me of something else.  I consider accountholder a good way to describe a role which may use an account.  voicemailaudit or journaling are a couple of examples that represent a named account which a person probably won't interact with.  The accountholder, then, is the role of the account itself.

[tmekelburg1]

Accountholder as one word does check out and it does have the added benefit of easy indexing. Probably works out well in database field naming conventions, e.g., accountholder_firstname, accountholder_lastname, etc. 

Extant is an interesting word for sure. I feel like you deserve to make up your own word for that specific of a definition. 

---

---

[rslade]

> jmikesmith (Newcomer III) posted a new reply in Tech Talk on 03-24-2021 08:57 AM

> How about "workers"? Define it to include managers/executives, but not
> administrators.

So, you're saying that those of us in IT and security don't do any work?

======================
rslade@gmail.com rmslade@outlook.com rslade@computercrime.org
"If you do buy a computer, don't turn it on." - Richards' 2nd Law
"Robert Slade's Guide to Computer Viruses" 0-387-94663-2
"Viruses Revealed" 0-07-213090-3
"Software Forensics" 0-07-142804-6
"Dictionary of Information Security" Syngress 1-59749-115-2
"Cybersecurity Lessons from CoVID-19" CRC Press 978-0-367-68269-9
============= for back issues:
[Base URL] site http://victoria.tc.ca/techrev/
CISSP refs: [Base URL]mnbksccd.htm
PC Security: [Base URL]mnvrrvsc.htm
Security Dict.: [Base URL]secgloss.htm
Security Educ.: [Base URL]comseced.htm
Book reviews: [Base URL]mnbk.htm
[Base URL]review.htm
Partial/recent: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/techbooks/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Slade
https://is.gd/RotlWB http://twitter.com/rslade
http://blogs.securiteam.com/index.php/archives/author/p1/

[jmikesmith]

---

@rslade wrote:
> jmikesmith (Newcomer III) posted a new reply in Tech Talk on 03-24-2021 08:57 AM

> How about "workers"? Define it to include managers/executives, but not
> administrators.

So, you're saying that those of us in IT and security don't do any work?

---

Administration isn't work! It's fun! 😉

Mike