Also a project manager......I am glad to have found this line of discussion......I have been feeling the same way, and actually complained rather loudly and repeatedly when the new site was deployed in the midst of an online course I was taking. I don't like to be a complainer, as I'm sure most of us feel, having been on projects that at some point, didn't go well. But, as you mentioned......for an organization as proudly public and professional as it is, (ISC)2 and/or its vendor dropped the ball on this one.
It seems there was little to no Human Factors consideration here. The outcome is non-intuitve and less than usefu to members.
Kudos! thanks for having the courage to bring up this topic.I still like the old portal even though it less fancy but it served its purpose.
@Bryiantan wrote:Kudos! thanks for having the courage to bring up this topic.I still like the old portal even though it less fancy but it served its purpose.
It was designed to fancy the executives who signed the paycheck ? Shouldn't be the end-user experience the No. 1 priority ? I am fully disappointed with this portal and can't believe a professional organization like (ISC)2 will have such work. It is s shame, thumb down !
(ISC)² give us back the old portal. This is awfully unusable and it's a big step back in comparison to the very concise dashboard we had before. Please rollback asap until a better solution is found. This is not resistance to change, this is resistance to worsening UX.