cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Highlighted
Advocate I

Re: BioChipping Employees- Physical Security or Privacy?


@CISOScott wrote:

wonder if that is why bitcoin (anonymous digital transactions) were invented. 


That is precisely and explicitly why Bitcoin was developed and released: to provide a monetary exchange system that was not subject to regulation, oversight, taxation, or even awareness by any government. Note that all efforts by various governments to oversee and control Bitcoin transactions have focused on exchange services, and not the core Bitcoin system, itself. While it is not clear that the intent was to provide an exchange system for criminal or illicit transactions, the very features of Bitcoin is why it was adopted so quickly for commerce on the Dark Web.

 

 

 

Dr. D. Cragin Shelton, CISSP
Dr.Cragin@iCloud.com
https://CraginS.blogspot.com/
Advocate III

Re: BioChipping Employees- Physical Security or Privacy?

> CraginS (Advocate I) posted a new reply in Industry News on 11-26-2018 02:12 PM

> @CISOScott wrote: wonder if that is why bitcoin (anonymous digital
> transactions) were invented.
>  That is precisely and explicitly why Bitcoin was
> developed and released: to provide a monetary exchange system that was not
> subject to regulation, oversight, taxation, or even awareness by any government.

Of course Bitcoin is only one (and a not very stable) digital cash technology ...

See http://victoria.tc.ca/int-grps/books/techrev/bkdglmny.rvw

====================== (quote inserted randomly by Pegasus Mailer)
rslade@vcn.bc.ca slade@victoria.tc.ca rslade@computercrime.org
A: Yes.
> Q: Are you sure?
>> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
>>> Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
victoria.tc.ca/techrev/rms.htm http://twitter.com/rslade
http://blogs.securiteam.com/index.php/archives/author/p1/
https://is.gd/RotlWB

............
This message may or may not be governed by the terms of
http://www.noticebored.com/html/cisspforumfaq.html#Friday or
https://blogs.securiteam.com/index.php/archives/1468
Newcomer I

Re: BioChipping Employees- Physical Security or Privacy?

While I am against the premise for privacy reasons, there is an advantage to Bio-chipping.

You cannot lose a chip, it is less expensive, and can be combined for 2 or 3 factor authentication to increase security access. If the chip is inserted in the hand a special glove can mask the chip for privacy.

Newcomer III

Re: BioChipping Employees- Physical Security or Privacy?

Would you shake some ones gloved hand??? 

 

What if the person shaking your hand cloned your chip, or EMP it.

 

Surgeons are not cheap to replace it?

 

And taking note from Daniel Cuthberts comments on chopping off fingers, it will be whole hands being dismembered. At least I can keep my body whole if I stick with a bank card Smiley Happy

Advocate I

Re: BioChipping Employees- Physical Security or Privacy?

Prospects for mandatory bio-chipping look bleak in the UK:

Mandatory Implantation of Microchips in Employees? UK Gov’t Says it Would Likely be Illegal

"groups in Britain ranging from the Confederation of Business Industry to the Trades Union Congress (TUC) have spoken out against the prospect of companies forcing implants on employees, a step that could facilitate constant monitoring.

TUC secretary-general Francis O’Grady said in a statement this week new technologies should not be allowed to compromise a worker’s right to privacy. Employers should negotiate with their workforce about monitoring policies, he said."

 

 

Dr. D. Cragin Shelton, CISSP
Dr.Cragin@iCloud.com
https://CraginS.blogspot.com/
Advocate I

Re: BioChipping Employees- Physical Security or Privacy?

Interesting that the trade unions are chiming in on privacy issues.

 

Regards

 

Caute_cautim

Advocate I

Re: BioChipping Employees- Physical Security or Privacy?

An interesting debate, especially as New Zealand is going through a similar Identities discussion, I am sure Bio-chipping is bound to come up - the driver similar to Sweden reducing costs of services to communities.

 

Regards

 

Caute_cautim

Newcomer III

Re: BioChipping Employees- Physical Security or Privacy?

We can thank the great barons who rebelled and won us our rights and freedoms.

 

Without Magna Carta, it would possibly be deemed legal in the UK.

 

Then we would be one step closer to that awful film 'The humanity bureau' where unproductive employees could be deleted and packed up as fertilizer and shipped off on a pallet.

Newcomer I

Re: BioChipping Employees- Physical Security or Privacy?

In this day and age somebody's just as likely to kill you for your bank card as to take your hand. Biological diseases are usually passed through skin contact so a handshake could be deadly.
An EMP would take out all Electronics in about a mile radius. Not a likely scenario.
There are information security people probably all around you looking for a better way to protect your data.

As I said before I would not opted for this procedure but I understand I need for additional measures, or better measures.
Advocate I

Re: BioChipping Employees- Physical Security or Privacy?

And when we have all been tagged; then the mini low orbit satellites can report to central federal control, exactly where one is located with an exact point in in time, date and location.

 

Regards

 

Caute_cautim