cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Until_then
Contributor I

Did CPE Reqs Change?

For Education (Group A), the following is a copy and paste from the latest CPE handbook:
 
"Supporting documentation accepted in the event of an audit: course transcripts, awarded diplomas,
certificates or receipts of attendance, copies of official meeting minutes, or rosters/documentation of
registration materials.
If you do not have the proof of completion as listed above, please provide a brief description of no more than
250 words about what you learned and a certificate or letter of attendance"
 
In the past, I think the 250 word description was mandatory. Above, it seems to now be required ONLY IF you do not have proof of completion of the learning activity. Is this true? My particular activity in question is for reading books/magazines. Thank you
5 Replies
emb021
Advocate I

@Until_then 
I've been a ISC2 member for over 10 years with the CISSP.

As I always had some proof of my attendance for any event (class, conference, webinar, et al), I never had to bother with the 250 word description.

I ONLY had to use that when I rarely did a magazine or book for CPEs, because there is no other proof for that.

---
Michael Brown, CISSP, HCISPP, CISA, CISM, CGEIT, CRISC, CDPSE, GSLC, GSTRT, GLEG, GSNA, CIST, CIGE, ISSA Fellow
nkeaton
Advocate II

@emb021   I have always kept a soft copy and hard copy of my documentation for anything submit.  I have never done anything that required me to write anything up.  I do read books and magazines but never submitted a writeup for continuing education.  I keep my documentation and only submit it if an item is flagged for audit.  

Until_then
Contributor I

Thank you.
denbesten
Community Champion


@nkeaton wrote:

I keep my documentation and only submit it if an item is flagged for audit.  


There is an advantage to proactively uploading evidence.  The few times I have been flagged for audit, the auditor was able to complete their work with absolutely no involvement from me.  All I got was a notice of audit followed a few days later by a notification of positive outcome.

 


@Until_then wrote:  

In the past, I think the 250 word description was mandatory. ... for reading books/magazines.


The written rule has changed a bit over the years.  The 2015 CPE handbook (10 years old) had the following:

 

Reading cyber security book/magazine – Group A only
Members can earn five CPE credits for each category: limited to one book per cycle year for five CPE credits; limited to one paid information security magazine subscription per cycle year for five CPE credits.
Members are required to upload a brief summary (approx. 150 words) of their learning experience from a security book they read in order to receive CPE credits.

The 2024 CPE handbook (current) has the following:

 

Education (Group A)
...
Max CPE credits
5 per book
5 per magazine
1 per paper
Supporting documentation accepted in the event of an audit: course transcripts, awarded diplomas,
certificates or receipts of attendance, copies of official meeting minutes, or rosters/documentation of
registration materials.
If you do not have the proof of completion as listed above, please provide a brief description of no more than
250 words about what you learned and a certificate or letter of attendance.

That said, I do not think the intent has changed. I consider this more of an editorial simplification.  Historically, documentation was enumerated for individual education activities.  Now, it is enumerated for education as a whole.  The end effect is unchanged given that "book, magazine, whitepaper" inherently does not have any of the other supporting documentation.

 

I am able to reach my annual requirement without any "book/magazine/whitepaper" CPEs, so I wholesale avoid the category (the ISC2 quiz being the exception).  I figure the extra callouts are a clue that the category raises audit-flags.

 

 

 

 

nkeaton
Advocate II

@emb021   After years of a kludgy and slapped together continuing education program from CompTIA (even have to zip the files and none over 1MB), when ISC2 came up with the ability to submit documentation a few years ago, I decided not to take advantage of that and keep my own records as I always have.  First there is zero reason to clog ISC2's servers with that documentation when it is not needed.  I have been audited maybe 5 or 6 times since 2013.  It is very easy to take my documentation and submit it.  So I would do it however feels comfortable to you.  I am fine with this way, and my CPEs would take up way too much room on their servers for zero reason.  So I am glad that it is optional.  My records are complete if ISC2 ever does want them.  I definitely will not be reviewing any books or articles.  I do want to write an article but not for CPEs.  I would have already but don't need the red tape of dealing with corporate communications.