<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: &amp;quot;Community&amp;quot; inconsistency in Welcome</title>
    <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Welcome/quot-Community-quot-inconsistency/m-p/10863#M1157</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;The time range being displayed is the last 30 days.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Click on "View All &amp;gt;&amp;gt;", to view with different time ranges.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2018 20:26:19 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>denbesten</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-05-28T20:26:19Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>"Community" inconsistency</title>
      <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Welcome/quot-Community-quot-inconsistency/m-p/10861#M1156</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;One of the interesting things about the "community" interface is how inconsistent it is, about the simplest of things.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;For example, there is the issue of kudos, which, as I have noted before, are vitally important to the "community."&amp;nbsp; And yet the interface reports them differently in different places.&amp;nbsp; On the home page for the "community" is a list of "Top Contributors."&amp;nbsp; Achievement of a position on this list is, apparently, based not on posts or replies, but on kudos.&amp;nbsp; As I write this, the top four have 50, 29, 24, and 22 kudos respectively.&amp;nbsp; And yet, immediately above this list, I see my stats, indicating I have 33 kudos, and therefore should have a position on that list.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;And yet, in truth, I &lt;STRONG&gt;shouldn't&lt;/STRONG&gt; have a place on that list.&amp;nbsp; If you check on the profiles of the members on the list, you will find that they &lt;STRONG&gt;actually&lt;/STRONG&gt; have 96, 36, 101, and 191 kudos, respectively.&amp;nbsp; (Which, at the very least, indicates that the list is out of order.)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Given the disparity on this extremely simple metric, I rather wonder about the accuracy of the "Latest Topics" and "Hot Topics," as well as many other features.&amp;nbsp; (I have previously noted the oddities of the "Search" function ...)&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2023 08:47:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Welcome/quot-Community-quot-inconsistency/m-p/10861#M1156</guid>
      <dc:creator>rslade</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-10-09T08:47:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: "Community" inconsistency</title>
      <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Welcome/quot-Community-quot-inconsistency/m-p/10863#M1157</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The time range being displayed is the last 30 days.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Click on "View All &amp;gt;&amp;gt;", to view with different time ranges.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2018 20:26:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Welcome/quot-Community-quot-inconsistency/m-p/10863#M1157</guid>
      <dc:creator>denbesten</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-05-28T20:26:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

