<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic 10,000 Qubits to Run Shor’s Algorithm in Tech Talk</title>
    <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Tech-Talk/10-000-Qubits-to-Run-Shor-s-Algorithm/m-p/88925#M5403</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi All&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;1 Mar 2026 &lt;/STRONG&gt;– On the same day that Google Quantum AI published its &lt;A href="https://postquantum.com/security-pqc/google-quantum-bitcoin-ecdlp/" target="_blank"&gt;landmark ECDLP-256 resource estimates&lt;/A&gt; showing fewer than 500,000 superconducting qubits could break cryptocurrency cryptography in minutes, a team from Oratomic, Caltech, and UC Berkeley quietly dropped a paper making an even more startling claim about qubit count: Shor’s algorithm can be executed at cryptographically relevant scales with as few as 10,000 reconfigurable neutral atom qubits.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The paper, titled &lt;EM&gt;“&lt;A href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28627" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank"&gt;Shor’s algorithm is possible with as few as 10,000 reconfigurable atomic qubits,&lt;/A&gt;“&lt;/EM&gt; is authored by Madelyn Cain, Qian Xu, Robbie King, Lewis Picard, Harry Levine, Manuel Endres, John Preskill, Hsin-Yuan Huang, and Dolev Bluvstein. The team spans Oratomic — a new quantum computing startup based in Pasadena — Caltech, and UC Berkeley. For those tracking the field, the names Bluvstein (who led Harvard’s landmark neutral atom fault-tolerance demonstrations), Preskill (one of the founders of quantum error correction theory), and Endres (Caltech atomic physics) signal exceptional technical credibility.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The two papers are not independent. Oratomic’s ECC-256 resource estimates explicitly use Google’s newly published circuit compilations — the same circuits verified by Google’s zero-knowledge proof. Google showed the circuits are efficient. Oratomic shows those circuits can run on dramatically fewer physical qubits — but on a fundamentally different type of machine, with fundamentally different implications for the threat timeline.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://postquantum.com/security-pqc/10000-qubits-shors/" target="_blank"&gt;https://postquantum.com/security-pqc/10000-qubits-shors/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Caute_Cautim&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 19:47:32 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Caute_cautim</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-03-31T19:47:32Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>10,000 Qubits to Run Shor’s Algorithm</title>
      <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Tech-Talk/10-000-Qubits-to-Run-Shor-s-Algorithm/m-p/88925#M5403</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi All&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;1 Mar 2026 &lt;/STRONG&gt;– On the same day that Google Quantum AI published its &lt;A href="https://postquantum.com/security-pqc/google-quantum-bitcoin-ecdlp/" target="_blank"&gt;landmark ECDLP-256 resource estimates&lt;/A&gt; showing fewer than 500,000 superconducting qubits could break cryptocurrency cryptography in minutes, a team from Oratomic, Caltech, and UC Berkeley quietly dropped a paper making an even more startling claim about qubit count: Shor’s algorithm can be executed at cryptographically relevant scales with as few as 10,000 reconfigurable neutral atom qubits.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The paper, titled &lt;EM&gt;“&lt;A href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28627" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank"&gt;Shor’s algorithm is possible with as few as 10,000 reconfigurable atomic qubits,&lt;/A&gt;“&lt;/EM&gt; is authored by Madelyn Cain, Qian Xu, Robbie King, Lewis Picard, Harry Levine, Manuel Endres, John Preskill, Hsin-Yuan Huang, and Dolev Bluvstein. The team spans Oratomic — a new quantum computing startup based in Pasadena — Caltech, and UC Berkeley. For those tracking the field, the names Bluvstein (who led Harvard’s landmark neutral atom fault-tolerance demonstrations), Preskill (one of the founders of quantum error correction theory), and Endres (Caltech atomic physics) signal exceptional technical credibility.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The two papers are not independent. Oratomic’s ECC-256 resource estimates explicitly use Google’s newly published circuit compilations — the same circuits verified by Google’s zero-knowledge proof. Google showed the circuits are efficient. Oratomic shows those circuits can run on dramatically fewer physical qubits — but on a fundamentally different type of machine, with fundamentally different implications for the threat timeline.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://postquantum.com/security-pqc/10000-qubits-shors/" target="_blank"&gt;https://postquantum.com/security-pqc/10000-qubits-shors/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Caute_Cautim&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 19:47:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Tech-Talk/10-000-Qubits-to-Run-Shor-s-Algorithm/m-p/88925#M5403</guid>
      <dc:creator>Caute_cautim</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-03-31T19:47:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

