<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Why is 128-bit AES Insecure for a Quantum Computer, But 256-bit Is Not? in Tech Talk</title>
    <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Tech-Talk/Why-is-128-bit-AES-Insecure-for-a-Quantum-Computer-But-256-bit/m-p/65549#M4223</link>
    <description>Yea there are much faster exponentials than doubling sets&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Though I mean it’s probably already happened somewhere and the sneaky-beakies somewhere are sitting on it enjoying the intel edge…</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2023 03:57:38 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Early_Adopter</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-12-20T03:57:38Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Why is 128-bit AES Insecure for a Quantum Computer, But 256-bit Is Not?</title>
      <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Tech-Talk/Why-is-128-bit-AES-Insecure-for-a-Quantum-Computer-But-256-bit/m-p/65533#M4220</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi All&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;An interesting explanation for those who really want to know why 128-bit AES is insecure for a Quantum Computer whereas 256-bit AES is not.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://medium.com/asecuritysite-when-bob-met-alice/why-is-128-bit-aes-insecure-for-a-quantum-computer-but-256-bit-is-not-814a8a9d6500" target="_blank"&gt;https://medium.com/asecuritysite-when-bob-met-alice/why-is-128-bit-aes-insecure-for-a-quantum-computer-but-256-bit-is-not-814a8a9d6500&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Caute_Cautim&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2023 20:25:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Tech-Talk/Why-is-128-bit-AES-Insecure-for-a-Quantum-Computer-But-256-bit/m-p/65533#M4220</guid>
      <dc:creator>Caute_cautim</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-12-19T20:25:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why is 128-bit AES Insecure for a Quantum Computer, But 256-bit Is Not?</title>
      <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Tech-Talk/Why-is-128-bit-AES-Insecure-for-a-Quantum-Computer-But-256-bit/m-p/65544#M4221</link>
      <description>To fight the power of doubling sets, double your set!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2023 02:09:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Tech-Talk/Why-is-128-bit-AES-Insecure-for-a-Quantum-Computer-But-256-bit/m-p/65544#M4221</guid>
      <dc:creator>Early_Adopter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-12-20T02:09:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why is 128-bit AES Insecure for a Quantum Computer, But 256-bit Is Not?</title>
      <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Tech-Talk/Why-is-128-bit-AES-Insecure-for-a-Quantum-Computer-But-256-bit/m-p/65545#M4222</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;U&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.isc2.org/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/797288093"&gt;@Early_Adopter&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; This may work for RSA 2048-bit keys to 4096 bit - but apparently some are predicting 2025 could the be big year for Q-Day instead.&amp;nbsp; A year earlier.&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;U&gt;Regards&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;U&gt;Caute_Cautim&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2023 03:44:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Tech-Talk/Why-is-128-bit-AES-Insecure-for-a-Quantum-Computer-But-256-bit/m-p/65545#M4222</guid>
      <dc:creator>Caute_cautim</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-12-20T03:44:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why is 128-bit AES Insecure for a Quantum Computer, But 256-bit Is Not?</title>
      <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Tech-Talk/Why-is-128-bit-AES-Insecure-for-a-Quantum-Computer-But-256-bit/m-p/65549#M4223</link>
      <description>Yea there are much faster exponentials than doubling sets&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Though I mean it’s probably already happened somewhere and the sneaky-beakies somewhere are sitting on it enjoying the intel edge…</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2023 03:57:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Tech-Talk/Why-is-128-bit-AES-Insecure-for-a-Quantum-Computer-But-256-bit/m-p/65549#M4223</guid>
      <dc:creator>Early_Adopter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-12-20T03:57:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why is 128-bit AES Insecure for a Quantum Computer, But 256-bit Is Not?</title>
      <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Tech-Talk/Why-is-128-bit-AES-Insecure-for-a-Quantum-Computer-But-256-bit/m-p/65603#M4224</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.isc2.org/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/809125741"&gt;@Caute_cautim&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;Thanks for sharing it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2023 01:28:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Tech-Talk/Why-is-128-bit-AES-Insecure-for-a-Quantum-Computer-But-256-bit/m-p/65603#M4224</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kyaw_Myo_Oo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-12-21T01:28:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

