<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Open Group Jericho Cloud Cube Model: Selecting Cloud Formations for Secure Collaboration in Tech Talk</title>
    <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Tech-Talk/Open-Group-Jericho-Cloud-Cube-Model-Selecting-Cloud-Formations/m-p/13870#M417</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In my readings on Cloud Computing security, I have stumbled across the Jericho Cloud Cube security model from the Open Group. I've been clouding around a bit recently, yet this was the first I had heard of it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.opengroup.org/subjectareas/security" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.opengroup.org/subjectareas/security&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://blog.opengroup.org/2013/10/29/jericho-forum-declares-success-and-sunsets/" target="_blank"&gt;https://blog.opengroup.org/2013/10/29/jericho-forum-declares-success-and-sunsets/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Is this model still in use (v1 April 2009!)?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Are there more advanced or granular models (for example from CSA, NIST, ENISA, etc.)?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Are you aware of how TOGAF is progressing with security architecture in general and with cloud security architecture and architectural models?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;I very much like the style of the white paper because it addresses business issues in a focused way and it eschews the cloud gobbledygook that cause many's eyes to glaze over in confusion and frustration.&amp;nbsp;Have any of you used it or have it as a reference in your cloud security initiatives?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2023 08:54:38 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>j_M007</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-10-09T08:54:38Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Open Group Jericho Cloud Cube Model: Selecting Cloud Formations for Secure Collaboration</title>
      <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Tech-Talk/Open-Group-Jericho-Cloud-Cube-Model-Selecting-Cloud-Formations/m-p/13870#M417</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In my readings on Cloud Computing security, I have stumbled across the Jericho Cloud Cube security model from the Open Group. I've been clouding around a bit recently, yet this was the first I had heard of it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.opengroup.org/subjectareas/security" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.opengroup.org/subjectareas/security&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://blog.opengroup.org/2013/10/29/jericho-forum-declares-success-and-sunsets/" target="_blank"&gt;https://blog.opengroup.org/2013/10/29/jericho-forum-declares-success-and-sunsets/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Is this model still in use (v1 April 2009!)?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Are there more advanced or granular models (for example from CSA, NIST, ENISA, etc.)?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Are you aware of how TOGAF is progressing with security architecture in general and with cloud security architecture and architectural models?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;I very much like the style of the white paper because it addresses business issues in a focused way and it eschews the cloud gobbledygook that cause many's eyes to glaze over in confusion and frustration.&amp;nbsp;Have any of you used it or have it as a reference in your cloud security initiatives?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2023 08:54:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Tech-Talk/Open-Group-Jericho-Cloud-Cube-Model-Selecting-Cloud-Formations/m-p/13870#M417</guid>
      <dc:creator>j_M007</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-10-09T08:54:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Open Group Jericho Cloud Cube Model: Selecting Cloud Formations for Secure Collaboration</title>
      <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Tech-Talk/Open-Group-Jericho-Cloud-Cube-Model-Selecting-Cloud-Formations/m-p/18833#M868</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;CCM uses four dimensions to describe different Cloud formations.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The model is a useful tool for categorizing&amp;nbsp;Cloud services and, more importantly, in my opinion, for highlighting certain features of Cloud Computing models. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;For example, a traditional Private Cloud could be viewed as in-sourced, internal, proprietary and perimeterised. However, a Private Cloud could also be outsourced, external, proprietary and perimeterised, if that Cloud service was to be hosted on the Cloud provider’s premises, but still dedicated to a single consumer. In this case, there is&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;very little difference between an outsourced Private Cloud and a traditional outsourcing model.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;So this conceptual model helps to understand consumers requirement.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;my 2 cents&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Cheers&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2019 02:40:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Tech-Talk/Open-Group-Jericho-Cloud-Cube-Model-Selecting-Cloud-Formations/m-p/18833#M868</guid>
      <dc:creator>iluom</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-09T02:40:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

