<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Is AI ready to handle cyber-economic warfare? in Tech Talk</title>
    <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Tech-Talk/Is-AI-ready-to-handle-cyber-economic-warfare/m-p/60431#M3982</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;The article makes three interesting assertions (paraphrased):&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Technology vendors haven't been held accountable for their shoddy products and services&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;US importation policies don't check for foreign malware (or malice)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Small manufacturers don't have resources to defend against cyberwarfare.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I disagree mostly with the third. In a prior life, I worked with a small, very specialized manufacturer with several government contracts. The small operation made security much easier from a strategic standpoint. That said, the attitude of senior leadership was the biggest challenge to security - and that is the truth no matter the operation's size. It's more about planning and commitment than size or even cost.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What's an interesting takeaway is that we may be seeing a shrinking of globalization. If you want to be a global player, the risk or cost of mitigation may be too much. Sure, Toyota may have suffered a $400 million hit because a supplier was hit with ransomware. But that is (and was) a measurable business risk that Toyota and its supplier should have identified at some point. The solution may lead to bringing supply chains entirely within the well-secured (ideally) walls of your big-business castle, in essence, cutting off a lot of the smaller global commerce that has been on the rise over the past quarter century or so.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 02 Jul 2023 11:57:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>JoePete</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-07-02T11:57:15Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Is AI ready to handle cyber-economic warfare?</title>
      <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Tech-Talk/Is-AI-ready-to-handle-cyber-economic-warfare/m-p/60427#M3981</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi All&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The use of AI within cyber warfare is occurring according to a recent article in the "The Hill".&amp;nbsp; It is thought provoking, especially you think that a lot of Small to Medium Enterprises are responsible for a great deal of manufacturing of goods and supplies world wide.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Will it lead to Cyber-economic warfare?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://thehill.com/opinion/cybersecurity/4072138-is-ai-ready-to-handle-cyber-economic-warfare/?utm_campaign=Oktopost-2023-07+Advocate+Posts&amp;amp;utm_content=Oktopost-linkedin&amp;amp;utm_medium=social&amp;amp;utm_source=linkedin" target="_blank"&gt;https://thehill.com/opinion/cybersecurity/4072138-is-ai-ready-to-handle-cyber-economic-warfare/?utm_campaign=Oktopost-2023-07+Advocate+Posts&amp;amp;utm_content=Oktopost-linkedin&amp;amp;utm_medium=social&amp;amp;utm_source=linkedin&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Caute_Cautim&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2023 10:36:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Tech-Talk/Is-AI-ready-to-handle-cyber-economic-warfare/m-p/60427#M3981</guid>
      <dc:creator>Caute_cautim</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-10-09T10:36:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is AI ready to handle cyber-economic warfare?</title>
      <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Tech-Talk/Is-AI-ready-to-handle-cyber-economic-warfare/m-p/60431#M3982</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The article makes three interesting assertions (paraphrased):&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Technology vendors haven't been held accountable for their shoddy products and services&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;US importation policies don't check for foreign malware (or malice)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Small manufacturers don't have resources to defend against cyberwarfare.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I disagree mostly with the third. In a prior life, I worked with a small, very specialized manufacturer with several government contracts. The small operation made security much easier from a strategic standpoint. That said, the attitude of senior leadership was the biggest challenge to security - and that is the truth no matter the operation's size. It's more about planning and commitment than size or even cost.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What's an interesting takeaway is that we may be seeing a shrinking of globalization. If you want to be a global player, the risk or cost of mitigation may be too much. Sure, Toyota may have suffered a $400 million hit because a supplier was hit with ransomware. But that is (and was) a measurable business risk that Toyota and its supplier should have identified at some point. The solution may lead to bringing supply chains entirely within the well-secured (ideally) walls of your big-business castle, in essence, cutting off a lot of the smaller global commerce that has been on the rise over the past quarter century or so.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 02 Jul 2023 11:57:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Tech-Talk/Is-AI-ready-to-handle-cyber-economic-warfare/m-p/60431#M3982</guid>
      <dc:creator>JoePete</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-07-02T11:57:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

