<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Microsoft’s Quantum Technology Myth vs Reality in Tech Talk</title>
    <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Tech-Talk/Microsoft-s-Quantum-Technology-Myth-vs-Reality/m-p/43248#M3140</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Microsoft’s full-stack quantum hardware ambitions received a sharp blow with news that&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.nature.com/articles/nature26142.epdf?sharing_token=objbUIUUSEOW3ilrUfLIjNRgN0jAjWel9jnR3ZoTv0NMVncI8f_WxeBXL9qVmz8rhsUw_2BmLBpyh2pBfhpr2E7hnQTfVJ9rB9i21dDd7VEx_jNK_V5dqqz2OatfmX7-sG8SuHd5R628gqHXVWxkpn3r5K7WrhVmLqwd05lB4Dk9HTGMsnRKST0Vv6LtvDfhpjFM0xxKPwF_lz6Osh9H0Q%3D%3D&amp;amp;tracking_referrer=www.bbc.com" target="_blank"&gt;a key research paper in Nature&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;that backed the company’s main quantum approach would be retracted.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;While other companies, such as IBM and Google, backed more traditional and better understood approaches to quantum computing early on, Microsoft sought to tap &lt;STRONG&gt;Majorana particles&lt;/STRONG&gt; for its own quantum system.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;By placing bets on this more esoteric model, the company hoped to leap into a leadership status. In 2018, Microsoft predicted processors using Majorana would be only 5 years away. Although that never happened Microsoft never shied away from its topological system as a long-shot bet. Then r&lt;SPAN&gt;esearchers began to have questions about the original paper, which is where their "research" took a serious turn and was retracted. That is a serious loss of credibility to Microsoft Quantum Engineering. The skeptics were right and evidence for the Majorana particle disappeared just like a ghost...&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-center" image-alt="braid_1024.jpg" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.isc2.org/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/5227i2F5BB56BA61D2C52/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="braid_1024.jpg" alt="braid_1024.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2023 09:47:52 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>AppDefects</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-10-09T09:47:52Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Microsoft’s Quantum Technology Myth vs Reality</title>
      <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Tech-Talk/Microsoft-s-Quantum-Technology-Myth-vs-Reality/m-p/43248#M3140</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Microsoft’s full-stack quantum hardware ambitions received a sharp blow with news that&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.nature.com/articles/nature26142.epdf?sharing_token=objbUIUUSEOW3ilrUfLIjNRgN0jAjWel9jnR3ZoTv0NMVncI8f_WxeBXL9qVmz8rhsUw_2BmLBpyh2pBfhpr2E7hnQTfVJ9rB9i21dDd7VEx_jNK_V5dqqz2OatfmX7-sG8SuHd5R628gqHXVWxkpn3r5K7WrhVmLqwd05lB4Dk9HTGMsnRKST0Vv6LtvDfhpjFM0xxKPwF_lz6Osh9H0Q%3D%3D&amp;amp;tracking_referrer=www.bbc.com" target="_blank"&gt;a key research paper in Nature&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;that backed the company’s main quantum approach would be retracted.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;While other companies, such as IBM and Google, backed more traditional and better understood approaches to quantum computing early on, Microsoft sought to tap &lt;STRONG&gt;Majorana particles&lt;/STRONG&gt; for its own quantum system.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;By placing bets on this more esoteric model, the company hoped to leap into a leadership status. In 2018, Microsoft predicted processors using Majorana would be only 5 years away. Although that never happened Microsoft never shied away from its topological system as a long-shot bet. Then r&lt;SPAN&gt;esearchers began to have questions about the original paper, which is where their "research" took a serious turn and was retracted. That is a serious loss of credibility to Microsoft Quantum Engineering. The skeptics were right and evidence for the Majorana particle disappeared just like a ghost...&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-center" image-alt="braid_1024.jpg" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.isc2.org/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/5227i2F5BB56BA61D2C52/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="braid_1024.jpg" alt="braid_1024.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2023 09:47:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Tech-Talk/Microsoft-s-Quantum-Technology-Myth-vs-Reality/m-p/43248#M3140</guid>
      <dc:creator>AppDefects</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-10-09T09:47:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Microsoft’s Quantum Technology Myth vs Reality</title>
      <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Tech-Talk/Microsoft-s-Quantum-Technology-Myth-vs-Reality/m-p/43365#M3154</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="g"&gt;&lt;DIV class="tF2Cxc"&gt;&lt;DIV class="IsZvec"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN class="aCOpRe"&gt;Microsoft's&amp;nbsp;full-stack&amp;nbsp;quantum&amp;nbsp;hardware ambitions received a sharp blow with news that a key research paper in Nature that backed the company's main.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV class="g"&gt;&lt;DIV class="tF2Cxc"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2021 07:28:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Tech-Talk/Microsoft-s-Quantum-Technology-Myth-vs-Reality/m-p/43365#M3154</guid>
      <dc:creator>Crouch502</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-17T07:28:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

