<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic A world Without Passwords in Tech Talk</title>
    <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Tech-Talk/A-world-Without-Passwords/m-p/32493#M2280</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I work with a multinational organisation who uses the IEC\ISO 270001 standards to base Policy on, I posted a question and reason why we should embrace Passwordless (&lt;A href="https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/security/business/identity/passwordless" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/security/business/identity/passwordless&lt;/A&gt;) and a question came up about if we are using 270001 as he base of policy could we really go this method.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could you help with advice on how you read this?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Darren&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2020 11:23:52 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>DG-ncl</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-02-07T11:23:52Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>A world Without Passwords</title>
      <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Tech-Talk/A-world-Without-Passwords/m-p/32493#M2280</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I work with a multinational organisation who uses the IEC\ISO 270001 standards to base Policy on, I posted a question and reason why we should embrace Passwordless (&lt;A href="https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/security/business/identity/passwordless" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/security/business/identity/passwordless&lt;/A&gt;) and a question came up about if we are using 270001 as he base of policy could we really go this method.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could you help with advice on how you read this?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Darren&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2020 11:23:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Tech-Talk/A-world-Without-Passwords/m-p/32493#M2280</guid>
      <dc:creator>DG-ncl</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-07T11:23:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: A world Without Passwords</title>
      <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Tech-Talk/A-world-Without-Passwords/m-p/32497#M2281</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;ISO 27001 is a set of requirements.&amp;nbsp; Many people often simply look at Annex A, but if you examine clause 6.1.3 you'll see that it's valid to identify risk treatments for your risks from any source.&amp;nbsp; That's means not simply 27001 or 27002, but any reasonable source of technical control.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So it would be valid to use passphrases in place of passwords, passwords with another factor, a smartcard, an application that generates an OTP etc etc.&amp;nbsp; Password are simply the traditional low tech means of authenticating users.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2020 13:42:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Tech-Talk/A-world-Without-Passwords/m-p/32497#M2281</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steve-Wilme</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-07T13:42:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: A world Without Passwords</title>
      <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Tech-Talk/A-world-Without-Passwords/m-p/32523#M2285</link>
      <description>Thank you for this information.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2020 22:52:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Tech-Talk/A-world-Without-Passwords/m-p/32523#M2285</guid>
      <dc:creator>DG-ncl</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-07T22:52:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

