<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Android Chips are flawed ... in Tech Talk</title>
    <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Tech-Talk/Android-Chips-are-flawed/m-p/26459#M1643</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I've never been a fan of the whole 'Droid ecosystem-HW, SW, whatever-ware. When I was developing a platform for the Navy to use for CAC verification 'Droid OS was always having issues with security. I attempted to be as vendor agnostic as I could but that OS kept causing our team lots of trouble.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It's no different &lt;A href="https://thehackernews.com/2019/08/android-qualcomm-vulnerability.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheHackersNews+%28The+Hackers+News+-+Cyber+Security+Blog%29&amp;amp;_m=3n.009a.2043.el0ao0e57v.19pi" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;now&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best platform that passed security reviews you ask? LOL Microsoft's Mobile OS.&amp;nbsp; As strange as it seems, the majority install base of MS product users did not carry over into the mobile platform.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2019 15:05:07 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Flyslinger2</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-08-06T15:05:07Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Android Chips are flawed ...</title>
      <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Tech-Talk/Android-Chips-are-flawed/m-p/26459#M1643</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I've never been a fan of the whole 'Droid ecosystem-HW, SW, whatever-ware. When I was developing a platform for the Navy to use for CAC verification 'Droid OS was always having issues with security. I attempted to be as vendor agnostic as I could but that OS kept causing our team lots of trouble.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It's no different &lt;A href="https://thehackernews.com/2019/08/android-qualcomm-vulnerability.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheHackersNews+%28The+Hackers+News+-+Cyber+Security+Blog%29&amp;amp;_m=3n.009a.2043.el0ao0e57v.19pi" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;now&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best platform that passed security reviews you ask? LOL Microsoft's Mobile OS.&amp;nbsp; As strange as it seems, the majority install base of MS product users did not carry over into the mobile platform.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2019 15:05:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Tech-Talk/Android-Chips-are-flawed/m-p/26459#M1643</guid>
      <dc:creator>Flyslinger2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-06T15:05:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

