<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic RACI for Disaster Recovery Plan in Tech Talk</title>
    <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Tech-Talk/RACI-for-Disaster-Recovery-Plan/m-p/24263#M1440</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Does anyone have a RACI for Disaster Recovery? Who owns the process? COBIT 5 for Information Security defines the CISO/ISM as contributors. I know it depends to a great extent on the risk framework that has been implemented but who takes the responsibility of ensuring the plan works?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2019 14:44:33 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>bjonah</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-06-26T14:44:33Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>RACI for Disaster Recovery Plan</title>
      <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Tech-Talk/RACI-for-Disaster-Recovery-Plan/m-p/24263#M1440</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Does anyone have a RACI for Disaster Recovery? Who owns the process? COBIT 5 for Information Security defines the CISO/ISM as contributors. I know it depends to a great extent on the risk framework that has been implemented but who takes the responsibility of ensuring the plan works?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2019 14:44:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Tech-Talk/RACI-for-Disaster-Recovery-Plan/m-p/24263#M1440</guid>
      <dc:creator>bjonah</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-26T14:44:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RACI for Disaster Recovery Plan</title>
      <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Tech-Talk/RACI-for-Disaster-Recovery-Plan/m-p/24293#M1441</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.isc2.org/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1069625775"&gt;@bjonah&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does anyone have a RACI for Disaster Recovery? Who owns the process? COBIT 5 for Information Security defines the CISO/ISM as contributors. I know it depends to a great extent on the risk framework that has been implemented but who takes the responsibility of ensuring the plan works?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;So difficult question to answer.&amp;nbsp; It depends on a number of things:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1) how large an organization&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2) is the a BCP person&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3) have you assigned DR Coordinators&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Typically Security would be contributors in their role as Security, however in an organization that places DR in the Security group (which I have seen), that person's role could be Responsible or Accountable.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have seen it both ways.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;d&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2019 00:07:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Tech-Talk/RACI-for-Disaster-Recovery-Plan/m-p/24293#M1441</guid>
      <dc:creator>dcontesti</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-27T00:07:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RACI for Disaster Recovery Plan</title>
      <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Tech-Talk/RACI-for-Disaster-Recovery-Plan/m-p/24300#M1442</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It depends on the scope of your BCP/DR plan and the strategy you've chosen to recover from an interruption.&amp;nbsp; You really have to approach this top down rather than thinking immediately about a RACI matrix.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I don't know where you are in the programme but I'd start with BIA of the business processes affected if there was an interruption and how long you could run a viable business with interrupted processes.&amp;nbsp; Then look at what you have in place to reduce the impact of a disruption, for example, single site HA, fail-over to a backup site, systems in multiple cloud availability zones etc.&amp;nbsp; Only once you've done this groundwork can you look at the operational plan and RACI for continuing to operate and recovering from an interruption.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;From an InfoSec perspective you simply need to ensure that the contingency measures used during the interruption does expose your organisation to further uneccessary risk.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2019 07:47:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Tech-Talk/RACI-for-Disaster-Recovery-Plan/m-p/24300#M1442</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steve-Wilme</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-27T07:47:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RACI for Disaster Recovery Plan</title>
      <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Tech-Talk/RACI-for-Disaster-Recovery-Plan/m-p/26505#M1645</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks. It makes sense to have an assigned Coordinator at a senior level. In terms of the overall responsibility for its implementation, it should be the CRO/CEO and the board.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2019 13:35:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Tech-Talk/RACI-for-Disaster-Recovery-Plan/m-p/26505#M1645</guid>
      <dc:creator>bjonah</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-07T13:35:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

