<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Factoring 2048-Bit RSA - Is the sky falling? in Tech Talk</title>
    <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Tech-Talk/Factoring-2048-Bit-RSA-Is-the-sky-falling/m-p/22765#M1324</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;In 2015 cryptographer Michele Mosca posed the hypophoric question “&lt;EM&gt;How many physical qubits will we need to break RSA-2048&lt;/EM&gt;? At the time he estimated more than a billion. Fast forward to today researchers Craig Gidney and Martin Ekera have published their findings: “&lt;EM&gt;&lt;A href="https://arxiv.org/pdf/1905.09749.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;How to factor 2048-bit RSA integers in 8 hours using 20 million noisy qubits&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;They report that the number of qubits necessary has dropped two orders of magnitude! True that you'll still require about 20 million to factor a 2048-bit RSA modulus, but for all you skeptics out there, and I know there are a few&lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":winking_face:"&gt;😉&lt;/span&gt;the significance of the research is that now we have a precise and quantitative understanding of the performance of Shor’s algorithms on a quantum computer and the physical limitations that need to be overcome to effectively factor RSA.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;When will RSA no longer be safe?&lt;/STRONG&gt; That depends on advances in the design of quantum error correcting code, the engineering of physical qubits, and the construction of quantum circuits.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If your paranoid, and you should be, start using a modulus &lt;STRONG&gt;n = 3072&lt;/STRONG&gt; or higher.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2023 09:12:46 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>AppDefects</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-10-09T09:12:46Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Factoring 2048-Bit RSA - Is the sky falling?</title>
      <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Tech-Talk/Factoring-2048-Bit-RSA-Is-the-sky-falling/m-p/22765#M1324</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;In 2015 cryptographer Michele Mosca posed the hypophoric question “&lt;EM&gt;How many physical qubits will we need to break RSA-2048&lt;/EM&gt;? At the time he estimated more than a billion. Fast forward to today researchers Craig Gidney and Martin Ekera have published their findings: “&lt;EM&gt;&lt;A href="https://arxiv.org/pdf/1905.09749.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;How to factor 2048-bit RSA integers in 8 hours using 20 million noisy qubits&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;They report that the number of qubits necessary has dropped two orders of magnitude! True that you'll still require about 20 million to factor a 2048-bit RSA modulus, but for all you skeptics out there, and I know there are a few&lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":winking_face:"&gt;😉&lt;/span&gt;the significance of the research is that now we have a precise and quantitative understanding of the performance of Shor’s algorithms on a quantum computer and the physical limitations that need to be overcome to effectively factor RSA.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;When will RSA no longer be safe?&lt;/STRONG&gt; That depends on advances in the design of quantum error correcting code, the engineering of physical qubits, and the construction of quantum circuits.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If your paranoid, and you should be, start using a modulus &lt;STRONG&gt;n = 3072&lt;/STRONG&gt; or higher.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2023 09:12:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Tech-Talk/Factoring-2048-Bit-RSA-Is-the-sky-falling/m-p/22765#M1324</guid>
      <dc:creator>AppDefects</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-10-09T09:12:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

