<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Protect your Banking Information in Tech Talk</title>
    <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Tech-Talk/Protect-your-Banking-Information/m-p/22015#M1257</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;You might consider using your bank's online bill-pay service instead of writing checks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Years ago, I began efforts to protect my checking account number after I realized how few proactive controls exist on EFT transfers.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Recently, I realized that my bank's online bill-pay can improve *my* operational-security. When I schedule a check, they transfer the money to a central account and send checks from that account. No longer does the vendor see my account number. This means that if anyone tries to pull a fast one, the bank's money is at risk, not mine.&amp;nbsp; Plus, it is their fraud department that deals with problems, not mine (which has a single, part-time employee &lt;img id="smileyhappy" class="emoticon emoticon-smileyhappy" src="https://community.isc2.org/i/smilies/16x16_smiley-happy.png" alt="Smiley Happy" title="Smiley Happy" /&gt;).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The cost is that the bank gets the float instead of me due to the timing of the withdrawal.&amp;nbsp; Not too worried about that though because I have saved more this year in postage than I would have earned in interest.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It did take me an embarrassingly long time to realizing that I could use bill-pay to send myself a check to validate what information did and did not appear on a check.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2019 22:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>denbesten</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-05-06T22:39:21Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Protect your Banking Information</title>
      <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Tech-Talk/Protect-your-Banking-Information/m-p/22015#M1257</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You might consider using your bank's online bill-pay service instead of writing checks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Years ago, I began efforts to protect my checking account number after I realized how few proactive controls exist on EFT transfers.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Recently, I realized that my bank's online bill-pay can improve *my* operational-security. When I schedule a check, they transfer the money to a central account and send checks from that account. No longer does the vendor see my account number. This means that if anyone tries to pull a fast one, the bank's money is at risk, not mine.&amp;nbsp; Plus, it is their fraud department that deals with problems, not mine (which has a single, part-time employee &lt;img id="smileyhappy" class="emoticon emoticon-smileyhappy" src="https://community.isc2.org/i/smilies/16x16_smiley-happy.png" alt="Smiley Happy" title="Smiley Happy" /&gt;).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The cost is that the bank gets the float instead of me due to the timing of the withdrawal.&amp;nbsp; Not too worried about that though because I have saved more this year in postage than I would have earned in interest.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It did take me an embarrassingly long time to realizing that I could use bill-pay to send myself a check to validate what information did and did not appear on a check.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2019 22:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Tech-Talk/Protect-your-Banking-Information/m-p/22015#M1257</guid>
      <dc:creator>denbesten</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-05-06T22:39:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

