<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Secure Data Act. Your thoughts on the chances of its passing and implications in Industry News</title>
    <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Industry-News/Secure-Data-Act-Your-thoughts-on-the-chances-of-its-passing-and/m-p/10299#M903</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.theregister.co.uk/2018/05/10/proposed_law_would_stop_feds_from_demanding_backdoors/" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.theregister.co.uk/2018/05/10/proposed_law_would_stop_feds_from_demanding_backdoors/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2018 21:42:09 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>vt100</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-05-12T21:42:09Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Secure Data Act. Your thoughts on the chances of its passing and implications</title>
      <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Industry-News/Secure-Data-Act-Your-thoughts-on-the-chances-of-its-passing-and/m-p/10299#M903</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.theregister.co.uk/2018/05/10/proposed_law_would_stop_feds_from_demanding_backdoors/" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.theregister.co.uk/2018/05/10/proposed_law_would_stop_feds_from_demanding_backdoors/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2018 21:42:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Industry-News/Secure-Data-Act-Your-thoughts-on-the-chances-of-its-passing-and/m-p/10299#M903</guid>
      <dc:creator>vt100</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-05-12T21:42:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Secure Data Act. Your thoughts on the chances of its passing and implications</title>
      <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Industry-News/Secure-Data-Act-Your-thoughts-on-the-chances-of-its-passing-and/m-p/10345#M910</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Until such time that our constitution (U.S.A.) is severely gutted I don't think this would happen.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It was also take very aggressive world wide coordination and there are many countries not capable of assisting technically.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2018 14:04:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Industry-News/Secure-Data-Act-Your-thoughts-on-the-chances-of-its-passing-and/m-p/10345#M910</guid>
      <dc:creator>Flyslinger2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-05-15T14:04:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Secure Data Act. Your thoughts on the chances of its passing and implications</title>
      <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Industry-News/Secure-Data-Act-Your-thoughts-on-the-chances-of-its-passing-and/m-p/10357#M915</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Vladimir,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;We should go get coffee one day.&amp;nbsp; &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":grinning_face_with_smiling_eyes:"&gt;😄&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I think that this bill is Constitutionally unnecessary, and likely to fail after passing the Legislature given the climate and veto powers of of the Executive Branch leadership.&amp;nbsp; I also think that it will be an unfortunate waste of effort by the government to continue to pursue&amp;nbsp;backdoor access.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The Constitution has come under some intense fire in the last few years.&amp;nbsp; In the name of security and what appears to be a waning lack of personal responsibility, the call to shred the Bill of Rights has climbed higher and higher.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The free access to and protection of encryption algorithms and computer source code under the First Amendment was already addressed by the court in 1996 (&lt;A href="https://www.eff.org/press/archives/2008/04/21-37).&amp;nbsp;" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.eff.org/press/archives/2008/04/21-37).&amp;nbsp;&lt;/A&gt; Therefore requiring software authors to write in a backdoor would be prior restraint upon those authors and programmers.&amp;nbsp; Since a consumer could simply purchase a non-US product or acquire a non-commercial product, the net effect is only the prior restraint of free speech against US based manufacturers of security software.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Under the Fourth Amendment protections the government lacks any default right to my documents and effects and therefore has no claim on which to base a&amp;nbsp;preemptive and presumptuous weakening of&amp;nbsp;the security that I employ.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That's my personal analysis.&amp;nbsp; I would love to hear counterpoints and other opinions.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sincerely,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Eric B.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2018 19:57:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Industry-News/Secure-Data-Act-Your-thoughts-on-the-chances-of-its-passing-and/m-p/10357#M915</guid>
      <dc:creator>Baechle</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-05-15T19:57:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

