<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic The U.S. Intelligence Community Just Put Quantum on Equal Footing with AI. in Industry News</title>
    <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Industry-News/The-U-S-Intelligence-Community-Just-Put-Quantum-on-Equal-Footing/m-p/88909#M7806</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi All&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;27 Mar 2026 &lt;/STRONG&gt;– Every March, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence publishes a document that most Americans will never read but that quietly shapes trillions of dollars in defense spending, intelligence priorities, and technology policy. The &lt;A href="https://www.dni.gov/index.php/newsroom/reports-publications/reports-publications-2026/4141-2026-annual-threat-assessment" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank"&gt;Annual Threat Assessment&lt;/A&gt; (ATA) is the Intelligence Community’s official, unclassified evaluation of the threats facing the United States – a consensus view from eighteen intelligence agencies, distilled into roughly thirty pages of carefully calibrated language.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This year’s edition, released on March 18 and presented to the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence by Director of National Intelligence, does something notable for anyone tracking quantum security: it treats quantum computing not as a footnote to cyber threats or a future curiosity, but as one of two defining technological challenges to U.S. national security – right alongside AI.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For those of us who have spent years arguing that quantum risk deserves boardroom and cabinet-level attention, this isn’t just bureaucratic reshuffling. It’s the U.S. intelligence establishment putting its institutional weight behind a position that the quantum security community has long advocated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://postquantum.com/security-pqc/ata-u-s-intelligence-quantum/" target="_blank"&gt;https://postquantum.com/security-pqc/ata-u-s-intelligence-quantum/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Caute_cautim&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 05:21:13 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Caute_cautim</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-03-31T05:21:13Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>The U.S. Intelligence Community Just Put Quantum on Equal Footing with AI.</title>
      <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Industry-News/The-U-S-Intelligence-Community-Just-Put-Quantum-on-Equal-Footing/m-p/88909#M7806</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi All&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;27 Mar 2026 &lt;/STRONG&gt;– Every March, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence publishes a document that most Americans will never read but that quietly shapes trillions of dollars in defense spending, intelligence priorities, and technology policy. The &lt;A href="https://www.dni.gov/index.php/newsroom/reports-publications/reports-publications-2026/4141-2026-annual-threat-assessment" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank"&gt;Annual Threat Assessment&lt;/A&gt; (ATA) is the Intelligence Community’s official, unclassified evaluation of the threats facing the United States – a consensus view from eighteen intelligence agencies, distilled into roughly thirty pages of carefully calibrated language.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This year’s edition, released on March 18 and presented to the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence by Director of National Intelligence, does something notable for anyone tracking quantum security: it treats quantum computing not as a footnote to cyber threats or a future curiosity, but as one of two defining technological challenges to U.S. national security – right alongside AI.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For those of us who have spent years arguing that quantum risk deserves boardroom and cabinet-level attention, this isn’t just bureaucratic reshuffling. It’s the U.S. intelligence establishment putting its institutional weight behind a position that the quantum security community has long advocated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://postquantum.com/security-pqc/ata-u-s-intelligence-quantum/" target="_blank"&gt;https://postquantum.com/security-pqc/ata-u-s-intelligence-quantum/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Caute_cautim&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 05:21:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Industry-News/The-U-S-Intelligence-Community-Just-Put-Quantum-on-Equal-Footing/m-p/88909#M7806</guid>
      <dc:creator>Caute_cautim</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-03-31T05:21:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

