<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ChatpGPT-4 for Medical Records - Thanks Microsoft and Epic in Industry News</title>
    <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Industry-News/ChatpGPT-4-for-Medical-Records-Thanks-Microsoft-and-Epic/m-p/58583#M6160</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;My thoughts only:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I see benefits to having REDACTED medical information being shared.&amp;nbsp; The more information that is shared, hopefully the medical profession may update/improve their procedures.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; The ability to send messages to patients may provide some benefit as the patient may receive information related to their conditions.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Having said that, it would not be advisable for the physician to input the users name.&amp;nbsp; (I see this as being a two step process - the doctor pulls down the information required and inputs into the email).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I can see information related to age (not birthdate), condition (current and pre-existing), medicines being prescribed, treatment and even city be included.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HOWEVER, I do see the downside of this type of usage.&amp;nbsp; If specific information is not Redacted, it could invade privacy.&amp;nbsp; Items I believe should be redacted includes (Birthday, Name, Home address, Phone numbers, (Basically what I call Tombstone data), Medical insurance information, Social Security information (SIN in Canada), this is a partial list.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Another downside would include insurance providers accessing the data and either denying insurance or increasing premiums or dropping coverage for specific conditions.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have always had concerns about the electronic transmission of medical information between medical practitioners and institutions but then I am old and sometimes grumpy.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My 2 cents&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;d&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2023 08:21:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>dcontesti</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-04-19T08:21:04Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ChatpGPT-4 for Medical Records - Thanks Microsoft and Epic</title>
      <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Industry-News/ChatpGPT-4-for-Medical-Records-Thanks-Microsoft-and-Epic/m-p/58581#M6159</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi All&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Given the hype and confabulation with ChatGPT-4, would you like your health records exposed to an AI, which may actually expose your privacy and make decisions?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2023/04/gpt-4-will-hunt-for-trends-in-medical-records-thanks-to-microsoft-and-epic/" target="_blank"&gt;https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2023/04/gpt-4-will-hunt-for-trends-in-medical-records-thanks-to-microsoft-and-epic/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Caute_Cautim&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2023 10:30:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Industry-News/ChatpGPT-4-for-Medical-Records-Thanks-Microsoft-and-Epic/m-p/58581#M6159</guid>
      <dc:creator>Caute_cautim</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-10-09T10:30:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ChatpGPT-4 for Medical Records - Thanks Microsoft and Epic</title>
      <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Industry-News/ChatpGPT-4-for-Medical-Records-Thanks-Microsoft-and-Epic/m-p/58583#M6160</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;My thoughts only:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I see benefits to having REDACTED medical information being shared.&amp;nbsp; The more information that is shared, hopefully the medical profession may update/improve their procedures.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; The ability to send messages to patients may provide some benefit as the patient may receive information related to their conditions.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Having said that, it would not be advisable for the physician to input the users name.&amp;nbsp; (I see this as being a two step process - the doctor pulls down the information required and inputs into the email).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I can see information related to age (not birthdate), condition (current and pre-existing), medicines being prescribed, treatment and even city be included.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HOWEVER, I do see the downside of this type of usage.&amp;nbsp; If specific information is not Redacted, it could invade privacy.&amp;nbsp; Items I believe should be redacted includes (Birthday, Name, Home address, Phone numbers, (Basically what I call Tombstone data), Medical insurance information, Social Security information (SIN in Canada), this is a partial list.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Another downside would include insurance providers accessing the data and either denying insurance or increasing premiums or dropping coverage for specific conditions.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have always had concerns about the electronic transmission of medical information between medical practitioners and institutions but then I am old and sometimes grumpy.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My 2 cents&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;d&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2023 08:21:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Industry-News/ChatpGPT-4-for-Medical-Records-Thanks-Microsoft-and-Epic/m-p/58583#M6160</guid>
      <dc:creator>dcontesti</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-04-19T08:21:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

