<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: US Supreme Court Cybersecurity Decision in Industry News</title>
    <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Industry-News/US-Supreme-Court-Cybersecurity-Decision/m-p/45846#M5495</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you for this post letting us know about this Supreme Court decision. We value your opinion and discussion on this.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We look forward to further discussion on this topic!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2021 19:07:29 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>AndreaMoore</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-06-03T19:07:29Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>US Supreme Court Cybersecurity Decision</title>
      <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Industry-News/US-Supreme-Court-Cybersecurity-Decision/m-p/45844#M5494</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Interesting decision in which the US Supreme court ruled that using a database you have access to for unauthorized reasons is NOT a violation of the US Cybercrime law.&amp;nbsp; The comments attributed to&amp;nbsp; Amy Coney Barrett on criminalizing commonplace activities is a shocking misunderstanding of intent, and I would look forward to an opinion on someone better qualified to describe the text as well.&amp;nbsp; She, and they, seem to be stating that the computer itself, or the application itself, is what is to be protected, not the information within.&amp;nbsp; That could decriminalize a huge amount of insider activity, including insider for profit, where people get a job for the sole purpose of extracting information, so what if they get caught and fired?&amp;nbsp; If they can't be prosecuted, and they are making more through whoever paid them for the information, that is a low risk action.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.cnn.com/2021/06/03/politics/supreme-court-cybercrime-law-case/index.html" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.cnn.com/2021/06/03/politics/supreme-court-cybercrime-law-case/index.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2021 16:50:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Industry-News/US-Supreme-Court-Cybersecurity-Decision/m-p/45844#M5494</guid>
      <dc:creator>mgorman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-06-03T16:50:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: US Supreme Court Cybersecurity Decision</title>
      <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Industry-News/US-Supreme-Court-Cybersecurity-Decision/m-p/45846#M5495</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you for this post letting us know about this Supreme Court decision. We value your opinion and discussion on this.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We look forward to further discussion on this topic!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2021 19:07:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Industry-News/US-Supreme-Court-Cybersecurity-Decision/m-p/45846#M5495</guid>
      <dc:creator>AndreaMoore</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-06-03T19:07:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: US Supreme Court Cybersecurity Decision</title>
      <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Industry-News/US-Supreme-Court-Cybersecurity-Decision/m-p/45854#M5496</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Employees can still be fired and prosecuted by State and Local laws, just not the CFAA. I am surprised on such a literal meaning the Supreme Court took but there are advocates for the other side saying it was too broad for today's environment anyway.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2021 19:53:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Industry-News/US-Supreme-Court-Cybersecurity-Decision/m-p/45854#M5496</guid>
      <dc:creator>tmekelburg1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-06-03T19:53:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

