<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Insecure Business Machines at it again! in Industry News</title>
    <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Industry-News/Insecure-Business-Machines-at-it-again/m-p/35418#M4421</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hot on the heels of IBM ignoring a vulnerability disclosure from a security researcher, that could result in unauthenticated remote code execution as root, because he wasn't a paying customer...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(Yes, they later said there had been a process error in acknowledging the disclosure, but only after they were ripped to shreds in the security press: &lt;A href="https://www.theregister.co.uk/2020/04/21/ibm_security_vulnerabilities/" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.theregister.co.uk/2020/04/21/ibm_security_vulnerabilities/&lt;/A&gt;)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;...they're now issuing take down requests for vulnerabilities in their software listed in exploit-db: &lt;A href="https://twitter.com/offsectraining/status/1258155194535292928" target="_blank"&gt;https://twitter.com/offsectraining/status/1258155194535292928&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I won't give my opinions about IBM's security practices or capabilities on here as I was always told if you don't have anything nice to say don't say anything at all!&amp;nbsp;&lt;img id="smileytongue" class="emoticon emoticon-smileytongue" src="https://community.isc2.org/i/smilies/16x16_smiley-tongue.png" alt="Smiley Tongue" title="Smiley Tongue" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2020 10:21:36 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>AlecTrevelyan</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-05-07T10:21:36Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Insecure Business Machines at it again!</title>
      <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Industry-News/Insecure-Business-Machines-at-it-again/m-p/35418#M4421</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hot on the heels of IBM ignoring a vulnerability disclosure from a security researcher, that could result in unauthenticated remote code execution as root, because he wasn't a paying customer...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(Yes, they later said there had been a process error in acknowledging the disclosure, but only after they were ripped to shreds in the security press: &lt;A href="https://www.theregister.co.uk/2020/04/21/ibm_security_vulnerabilities/" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.theregister.co.uk/2020/04/21/ibm_security_vulnerabilities/&lt;/A&gt;)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;...they're now issuing take down requests for vulnerabilities in their software listed in exploit-db: &lt;A href="https://twitter.com/offsectraining/status/1258155194535292928" target="_blank"&gt;https://twitter.com/offsectraining/status/1258155194535292928&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I won't give my opinions about IBM's security practices or capabilities on here as I was always told if you don't have anything nice to say don't say anything at all!&amp;nbsp;&lt;img id="smileytongue" class="emoticon emoticon-smileytongue" src="https://community.isc2.org/i/smilies/16x16_smiley-tongue.png" alt="Smiley Tongue" title="Smiley Tongue" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2020 10:21:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Industry-News/Insecure-Business-Machines-at-it-again/m-p/35418#M4421</guid>
      <dc:creator>AlecTrevelyan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-07T10:21:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

