<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic ElectionGuard in Industry News</title>
    <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Industry-News/ElectionGuard/m-p/33212#M4023</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Microsoft has come up with a new &lt;A href="https://lite.cnn.com/en/article/h_6371b42359928a22ad5ccd6d5369aef7" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;electronic voting system&lt;/A&gt;, called ElectionGuard.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(Yes, OK, &lt;STRONG&gt;that&lt;/STRONG&gt; Microsoft.&amp;nbsp; But it does sound possible.)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;First off, this is not online or remote voting.&amp;nbsp; This is a vote tabulation system.&amp;nbsp; You vote on a device, a memory card is read and counted, and you get a paper record of your vote.&amp;nbsp; The individual votes are encrypted using homomorphic encryption (probably a version of Rivest's "&lt;A href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ThreeBallot" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Three Ballot&lt;/A&gt;" algorithm).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ElectionGuard is open source, so I imagine that electronic voting researchers will be looking under the hood.&amp;nbsp; I'd like to know how you prevent election officials from reading the printouts that voters receive (but that's more a matter of training and process).&amp;nbsp; I'd like to know how many random challenges you make, taking real votes and checking to see if they've been tabulated properly.&amp;nbsp; (There are likely some legal issues in that regard.)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But it does sound promising.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2023 09:27:09 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>rslade</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-10-09T09:27:09Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ElectionGuard</title>
      <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Industry-News/ElectionGuard/m-p/33212#M4023</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Microsoft has come up with a new &lt;A href="https://lite.cnn.com/en/article/h_6371b42359928a22ad5ccd6d5369aef7" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;electronic voting system&lt;/A&gt;, called ElectionGuard.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(Yes, OK, &lt;STRONG&gt;that&lt;/STRONG&gt; Microsoft.&amp;nbsp; But it does sound possible.)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;First off, this is not online or remote voting.&amp;nbsp; This is a vote tabulation system.&amp;nbsp; You vote on a device, a memory card is read and counted, and you get a paper record of your vote.&amp;nbsp; The individual votes are encrypted using homomorphic encryption (probably a version of Rivest's "&lt;A href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ThreeBallot" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Three Ballot&lt;/A&gt;" algorithm).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ElectionGuard is open source, so I imagine that electronic voting researchers will be looking under the hood.&amp;nbsp; I'd like to know how you prevent election officials from reading the printouts that voters receive (but that's more a matter of training and process).&amp;nbsp; I'd like to know how many random challenges you make, taking real votes and checking to see if they've been tabulated properly.&amp;nbsp; (There are likely some legal issues in that regard.)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But it does sound promising.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2023 09:27:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Industry-News/ElectionGuard/m-p/33212#M4023</guid>
      <dc:creator>rslade</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-10-09T09:27:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

