<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Google demonstrates quantum supremacy!  (Maybe ...) in Industry News</title>
    <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Industry-News/Google-demonstrates-quantum-supremacy-Maybe/m-p/28559#M3521</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;OK, we've had discussions over &lt;A href="https://community.isc2.org/t5/Tech-Talk/PKI-and-Quantum-Computing/m-p/20044" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;whether quantum computers are going to end cryptography as we know it&lt;/A&gt; (spoiler alert - no).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Then there were reports that &lt;A href="https://community.isc2.org/t5/Industry-News/Quantum-computing-may-not-be-better/m-p/14783" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;quantum computers might not be possible&lt;/A&gt;!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Then there was the reassurance that if we did build one, &lt;A href="https://community.isc2.org/t5/Industry-News/Quantum-computers-really-are-better/m-p/11746" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;we could test it&lt;/A&gt;!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So, now &lt;A href="https://www.newscientist.com/article/2217347-google-claims-it-has-finally-reached-quantum-supremacy/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Google seems to have done it&lt;/A&gt;!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Maybe.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The paper got posted.&amp;nbsp; Then pulled.&amp;nbsp; It only has one author.&amp;nbsp; And, even if they did it, the processor only has 54 qubits, so there's a ways to go yet ...&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2019 00:31:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>rslade</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-10-01T00:31:51Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Google demonstrates quantum supremacy!  (Maybe ...)</title>
      <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Industry-News/Google-demonstrates-quantum-supremacy-Maybe/m-p/28559#M3521</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;OK, we've had discussions over &lt;A href="https://community.isc2.org/t5/Tech-Talk/PKI-and-Quantum-Computing/m-p/20044" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;whether quantum computers are going to end cryptography as we know it&lt;/A&gt; (spoiler alert - no).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Then there were reports that &lt;A href="https://community.isc2.org/t5/Industry-News/Quantum-computing-may-not-be-better/m-p/14783" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;quantum computers might not be possible&lt;/A&gt;!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Then there was the reassurance that if we did build one, &lt;A href="https://community.isc2.org/t5/Industry-News/Quantum-computers-really-are-better/m-p/11746" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;we could test it&lt;/A&gt;!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So, now &lt;A href="https://www.newscientist.com/article/2217347-google-claims-it-has-finally-reached-quantum-supremacy/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Google seems to have done it&lt;/A&gt;!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Maybe.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The paper got posted.&amp;nbsp; Then pulled.&amp;nbsp; It only has one author.&amp;nbsp; And, even if they did it, the processor only has 54 qubits, so there's a ways to go yet ...&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2019 00:31:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Industry-News/Google-demonstrates-quantum-supremacy-Maybe/m-p/28559#M3521</guid>
      <dc:creator>rslade</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-10-01T00:31:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Google demonstrates quantum supremacy!  (Maybe ...)</title>
      <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Industry-News/Google-demonstrates-quantum-supremacy-Maybe/m-p/28599#M3524</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;And yet, this article argues Google was not first:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.afr.com/technology/why-google-wasn-t-really-the-first-to-achieve-quantum-supremacy-20190927-p52vg6" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.afr.com/technology/why-google-wasn-t-really-the-first-to-achieve-quantum-supremacy-20190927-p52vg6&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2019 17:33:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Industry-News/Google-demonstrates-quantum-supremacy-Maybe/m-p/28599#M3524</guid>
      <dc:creator>dcontesti</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-10-01T17:33:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

