<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Certificate Lifecycle - is a shorter lifespan better? in Industry News</title>
    <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Industry-News/Certificate-Lifecycle-is-a-shorter-lifespan-better/m-p/27121#M3391</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Good topic and opinions, I completely agree.&amp;nbsp; I think an annual certificate upgrade is a reasonable for any organization.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Good security is not easy or cheap.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2019 19:07:26 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>apbanohit</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-08-20T19:07:26Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Certificate Lifecycle - is a shorter lifespan better?</title>
      <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Industry-News/Certificate-Lifecycle-is-a-shorter-lifespan-better/m-p/27119#M3390</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I've always been a proponent for tight cert expiration dates. I really don't like anything much over a year and more like 6 months.&amp;nbsp; Because many certs can be reissued auto-magically I don't sweat the shorter time spans.&amp;nbsp; Yes, PKI certs are tad different story but again, why issue a cert for 3 to 5 years when most employees only last 1.23745 years?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Recently the standards body for browsers proposed a &lt;A href="https://www.infosecurity-magazine.com/news/certificate-giant-slams-plan-short/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;change&lt;/A&gt;.&amp;nbsp; A big CA house did not like the new proposal. Personally, I think their reasons for keeping it longer are lame. I'm curious as to what your thoughts are.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2019 17:56:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Industry-News/Certificate-Lifecycle-is-a-shorter-lifespan-better/m-p/27119#M3390</guid>
      <dc:creator>Flyslinger2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-20T17:56:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Certificate Lifecycle - is a shorter lifespan better?</title>
      <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Industry-News/Certificate-Lifecycle-is-a-shorter-lifespan-better/m-p/27121#M3391</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Good topic and opinions, I completely agree.&amp;nbsp; I think an annual certificate upgrade is a reasonable for any organization.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Good security is not easy or cheap.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2019 19:07:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Industry-News/Certificate-Lifecycle-is-a-shorter-lifespan-better/m-p/27121#M3391</guid>
      <dc:creator>apbanohit</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-20T19:07:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

