<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic DoD RFP Petitioner Loses! in Industry News</title>
    <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Industry-News/DoD-RFP-Petitioner-Loses/m-p/25419#M3174</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;ORACLE&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://www.datacenterdynamics.com/news/oracle-loses-dod-court-challenge-10bn-pentagon-cloud-contract-go-aws-or-microsoft/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;loses&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;their DoD Joint Enterprise Defense Infrastructure (&lt;STRONG&gt;JEDI&lt;/STRONG&gt;) cloud court challenge. The ~$10bn Pentagon cloud contract to go to AWS or Microsoft as early as August 2019.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Whether because of impropriety, or simply because they had the best cloud service for this use case, the original JEDI proposal did indeed seem heavily favored towards AWS, with contractual stipulations only it met at the time. But with the added delay to the contract's closure, brought about by multiple lawsuits and internal investigations, Microsoft Azure has become a viable contender.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Full details of the &lt;STRONG&gt;JEDI RFP are &lt;A href="https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=opportunity&amp;amp;mode=form&amp;amp;id=f7f1d0314ec7c83cd0ace1636b5474a1&amp;amp;tab=core&amp;amp;_cview=0" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;here&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;. The security requirements are broad enough that you can drive a tank through them &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":winking_face:"&gt;😉&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2023 09:16:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>AppDefects</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-10-09T09:16:15Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>DoD RFP Petitioner Loses!</title>
      <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Industry-News/DoD-RFP-Petitioner-Loses/m-p/25419#M3174</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;ORACLE&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://www.datacenterdynamics.com/news/oracle-loses-dod-court-challenge-10bn-pentagon-cloud-contract-go-aws-or-microsoft/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;loses&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;their DoD Joint Enterprise Defense Infrastructure (&lt;STRONG&gt;JEDI&lt;/STRONG&gt;) cloud court challenge. The ~$10bn Pentagon cloud contract to go to AWS or Microsoft as early as August 2019.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Whether because of impropriety, or simply because they had the best cloud service for this use case, the original JEDI proposal did indeed seem heavily favored towards AWS, with contractual stipulations only it met at the time. But with the added delay to the contract's closure, brought about by multiple lawsuits and internal investigations, Microsoft Azure has become a viable contender.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Full details of the &lt;STRONG&gt;JEDI RFP are &lt;A href="https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=opportunity&amp;amp;mode=form&amp;amp;id=f7f1d0314ec7c83cd0ace1636b5474a1&amp;amp;tab=core&amp;amp;_cview=0" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;here&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;. The security requirements are broad enough that you can drive a tank through them &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":winking_face:"&gt;😉&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2023 09:16:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Industry-News/DoD-RFP-Petitioner-Loses/m-p/25419#M3174</guid>
      <dc:creator>AppDefects</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-10-09T09:16:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

