<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Facebook fact checking losing supports ... in Industry News</title>
    <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Industry-News/Facebook-fact-checking-losing-supports/m-p/18666#M2201</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I wouldn't be surprised if Facebook attempted to pay them 'under the table,' and subsequently, we're seeing that the table is wobbling --- though there's no telling exactly how that happened...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2019 01:25:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Shannon</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-02-05T01:25:50Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Facebook fact checking losing supports ...</title>
      <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Industry-News/Facebook-fact-checking-losing-supports/m-p/18650#M2198</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Facebook has been paying Associated Press and the Snopes site to help combat fake news on the Facebook site.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Fact-checking firms have been frustrated by Facebook's lack of transparency in this regard.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-47098021" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Snopes and AP are pulling out of the Facebook contracts&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2019 20:25:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Industry-News/Facebook-fact-checking-losing-supports/m-p/18650#M2198</guid>
      <dc:creator>rslade</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-04T20:25:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Facebook fact checking losing supports ...</title>
      <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Industry-News/Facebook-fact-checking-losing-supports/m-p/18666#M2201</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I wouldn't be surprised if Facebook attempted to pay them 'under the table,' and subsequently, we're seeing that the table is wobbling --- though there's no telling exactly how that happened...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2019 01:25:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Industry-News/Facebook-fact-checking-losing-supports/m-p/18666#M2201</guid>
      <dc:creator>Shannon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-05T01:25:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Facebook fact checking losing supports ...</title>
      <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Industry-News/Facebook-fact-checking-losing-supports/m-p/18680#M2203</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Smoke and mirrors comes to mind. It's a PR stunt to pacify those that don't dig deep. Those companies aren't interested in getting their reputations besmirched from FB's antics so they bailed.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2019 14:19:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Industry-News/Facebook-fact-checking-losing-supports/m-p/18680#M2203</guid>
      <dc:creator>Flyslinger2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-05T14:19:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

