<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic &amp;quot;Master&amp;quot; fingerprints ... in Industry News</title>
    <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Industry-News/quot-Master-quot-fingerprints/m-p/16610#M1922</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Researchers have &lt;A href="https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/nov/15/fake-fingerprints-can-imitate-real-fingerprints-in-biometric-systems-research" target="_blank"&gt;generated artificial fingerprints&lt;/A&gt; that function as "master keys" for fingerprint biometric systems.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I mean, this shouldn't happen, right?&amp;nbsp; Biometrics are supposed to be something you are, and unique to you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;OK, we all know that, in implementation, you can have some level of false positive results.&amp;nbsp; But in a system that should have an error rate of only one in a thousand, they were able to fake one in five.&amp;nbsp; (That's 200 in a thousand.)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As usual in these cases, the researchers were taking advantage of implementation errors, and those probably can be tightened up, but lots of fingerprint scanners won't be ...&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2023 09:01:37 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>rslade</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-10-09T09:01:37Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>"Master" fingerprints ...</title>
      <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Industry-News/quot-Master-quot-fingerprints/m-p/16610#M1922</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Researchers have &lt;A href="https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/nov/15/fake-fingerprints-can-imitate-real-fingerprints-in-biometric-systems-research" target="_blank"&gt;generated artificial fingerprints&lt;/A&gt; that function as "master keys" for fingerprint biometric systems.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I mean, this shouldn't happen, right?&amp;nbsp; Biometrics are supposed to be something you are, and unique to you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;OK, we all know that, in implementation, you can have some level of false positive results.&amp;nbsp; But in a system that should have an error rate of only one in a thousand, they were able to fake one in five.&amp;nbsp; (That's 200 in a thousand.)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As usual in these cases, the researchers were taking advantage of implementation errors, and those probably can be tightened up, but lots of fingerprint scanners won't be ...&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2023 09:01:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Industry-News/quot-Master-quot-fingerprints/m-p/16610#M1922</guid>
      <dc:creator>rslade</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-10-09T09:01:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: "Master" fingerprints ...</title>
      <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Industry-News/quot-Master-quot-fingerprints/m-p/16624#M1928</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The moral issue happens when it leaves the labs, and is used for the perpetration of crime - then people sit up and review such items.&amp;nbsp; Anything is possible these days and once again - when these technologies are created, do they think through the implications and to whom uses them?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I very much doubt it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Then it becomes another problem we have to go solve.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Caute_cautim&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2018 23:42:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Industry-News/quot-Master-quot-fingerprints/m-p/16624#M1928</guid>
      <dc:creator>Caute_cautim</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-11-23T23:42:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

