<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Sony claims it owns Bach? in Industry News</title>
    <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Industry-News/Sony-claims-it-owns-Bach/m-p/14936#M1623</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;As written for harpsichord by J.S. Bach (1685-1750), as arranged for piano by Ferruccio Busoni (1886-1924), as as performed by Glenn Gould &lt;SPAN&gt;(1932-1982), and as recorded by Gould&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;on the Sony label in 1955... By any measure, 47 seconds out of three minutes is pretty absurd.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2018 02:28:53 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>John_L</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-09-25T02:28:53Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Sony claims it owns Bach?</title>
      <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Industry-News/Sony-claims-it-owns-Bach/m-p/14676#M1590</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Sony, who have been so over-the-top in terms of protecting their intellectual property that they once created a virus stealthing technology in order to do so, has done it again.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Musician posts a video of himself playing a piece by Bach.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sony posts a takedown notice.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Musician posts a counter-notice, explaining that it is him playing Bach, and Bach died 300 years ago, so it's out of copyright protection.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://twitter.com/JRhodesPianist/status/1039172935112638466" target="_blank"&gt;Sony says they own it anyway&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(After a wee bit of &lt;A href="https://www.eff.org/takedowns/sony-finally-admits-it-doesnt-own-bach-and-it-only-took-public-pressure" target="_blank"&gt;social media pressure, Sony finally backs off&lt;/A&gt;.)&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2023 08:56:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Industry-News/Sony-claims-it-owns-Bach/m-p/14676#M1590</guid>
      <dc:creator>rslade</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-10-09T08:56:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Sony claims it owns Bach?</title>
      <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Industry-News/Sony-claims-it-owns-Bach/m-p/14936#M1623</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;As written for harpsichord by J.S. Bach (1685-1750), as arranged for piano by Ferruccio Busoni (1886-1924), as as performed by Glenn Gould &lt;SPAN&gt;(1932-1982), and as recorded by Gould&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;on the Sony label in 1955... By any measure, 47 seconds out of three minutes is pretty absurd.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2018 02:28:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Industry-News/Sony-claims-it-owns-Bach/m-p/14936#M1623</guid>
      <dc:creator>John_L</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-09-25T02:28:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

