<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Peer reviewed papers, similar to SANS in Member Support</title>
    <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Member-Support/Peer-reviewed-papers-similar-to-SANS/m-p/17006#M3288</link>
    <description>Was wondering if ISC 2 had something similar to SANS member papers, which have to be peer reviewed, and available to the public. If we don't, why? This would be a great way to get information out, and benefit to members reviewing the papers, which would allow growth, and benefit of people getting their name out there, which I'd assume would help alot of people receive possible opportunitues</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2018 16:18:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Curiousmind18</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-12-13T16:18:06Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Peer reviewed papers, similar to SANS</title>
      <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Member-Support/Peer-reviewed-papers-similar-to-SANS/m-p/17006#M3288</link>
      <description>Was wondering if ISC 2 had something similar to SANS member papers, which have to be peer reviewed, and available to the public. If we don't, why? This would be a great way to get information out, and benefit to members reviewing the papers, which would allow growth, and benefit of people getting their name out there, which I'd assume would help alot of people receive possible opportunitues</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2018 16:18:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Member-Support/Peer-reviewed-papers-similar-to-SANS/m-p/17006#M3288</guid>
      <dc:creator>Curiousmind18</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-12-13T16:18:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

