topic Re: The Rise of Fake Candidates in Remote Interviews in Threats

The Rise of Fake Candidates in Remote Interviews

akkem — Tue, 08 Apr 2025 18:29:44 GMT

Recent reports indicate a rise in job applicants using AI tools to cheat during remote interviews, complicating the hiring process for employers. This trend highlights the need for companies to adapt their recruitment strategies to ensure fair and effective candidate evaluations.

https://www.cnbc.com/2025/04/08/fake-job-seekers-use-ai-to-interview-for-remote-jobs-tech-ceos-say.html

Re: The Rise of Fake Candidates in Remote Interviews

denbesten — Wed, 09 Apr 2025 01:27:00 GMT

Hard to cheat during an in person interview.

Re: The Rise of Fake Candidates in Remote Interviews

Caute_cautim — Wed, 09 Apr 2025 05:56:50 GMT

Hi All

To spot potentially fake AI-generated interview content, focus on inconsistencies in facial and body movements, unnatural lip sync, and unexpected glitches like blurred or unnatural skin or hair. Look for signs of AI-generated text on resumes and consider using AI detection tools for audio and video.

Here's a more detailed breakdown:

and Body Movements:
AI often struggles with nuanced facial expressions and body language, leading to robotic or unnatural movements. Watch for inconsistencies in how the person blinks, moves their head, or adjusts their posture.

Lip Movements:
AI can have trouble with lip syncing, causing the movements to seem out of sync with the audio or unnatural.
Facial Features:
AI may struggle with details like wrinkles, shadows, or the appearance of glasses or facial hair. Look for imperfections or inconsistencies in these features.
Text and Resume AI Detection:
AI can be used to create impressive-sounding resumes. Use tools like GPTZero to scan text for AI-generated language and potential inconsistencies.
AI Detection Tools:
Some companies offer AI detection tools that can analyze video and audio for signs of manipulation, such as ElevenLabs' AI speech classifier or Microsoft's authenticator tool.

Uncanny Valley:
If you get an "off" or unsettling feeling, that's a sign that something might be off, as the human brain often generates a negative emotional response to AI-generated content.

Here are some suggestions.

Regards

Caute_Cautim

Re: The Rise of Fake Candidates in Remote Interviews

akkem — Wed, 09 Apr 2025 14:12:33 GMT

Agree! I believe in person will be more secure and potential.

Re: The Rise of Fake Candidates in Remote Interviews

nkeaton — Wed, 09 Apr 2025 14:37:30 GMT

@akkem Thank you. That was not what I was expecting and found this interesting. This is just one reason why remote employees are not a good choice in cybersecurity. I was kind of expecting a post about the Associate of ISC2 memberships misrepresenting themselves as CISSPs. I guess that LinkedIn is littered with them.

Re: The Rise of Fake Candidates in Remote Interviews

Caute_cautim — Wed, 09 Apr 2025 20:35:16 GMT

@nkeatonIt is relatively easy to root them out, especially if Linkedin assists to identify them and ask them for their credentials so they can be checked and validated. Maybe we should ask them kindly with their own inbuilt AI to do this as service to the community?

Or perhaps ISC2 Officers can make an official request?

What do you think?

Regards

Caute_Cautim

Re: The Rise of Fake Candidates in Remote Interviews

Spirnia — Wed, 09 Apr 2025 21:37:39 GMT

I feel you are spending much time thinking about the misrepresentation when you could be thinking positive thoughts which could boost your energy.

I’ll leave you with the Serenity Prayer.

I am sure you are familiar with it:

Re: The Rise of Fake Candidates in Remote Interviews

Spirnia — Wed, 09 Apr 2025 22:05:49 GMT

Why not do an awareness campaign for employers and recruiters on LinkedIn through ISC2?

Re: The Rise of Fake Candidates in Remote Interviews

nkeaton — Fri, 11 Apr 2025 14:41:07 GMT

@Caute_cautim I do like the idea. I am not sure how ISC2 would react. I had some others tell me that LinkedIn was littered with them. I did bring the issue up to ISC2 and only said that I should turn them in. I don't really use LinkedIn for much. There was someone on here bragging about being a CISSP with no experience. He left his LinkedIn link. I was curious and looked. Sure enough he was an Associate of ISC2 with no experience. The organization had already told me that if I see one that should turn them in. It wasn't a good feeling but did. We all work really hard for these certifications and is definitely misrepresentation on their part. I think that the military uses the term stolen valor.

Re: The Rise of Fake Candidates in Remote Interviews

Caute_cautim — Sat, 12 Apr 2025 01:25:12 GMT

@nkeaton

I totally agree, yes, we all worked really hard to gain the credential and every years maintain it too,

So, If I personally spot them, I will turn them in myself. I will try to validate them through the ISC2 portal, and then question whether or they are valid.

Regards

Caute_Cautim

Re: The Rise of Fake Candidates in Remote Interviews

nkeaton — Sat, 12 Apr 2025 14:40:19 GMT

@Caute_cautim I agree. The worst case that got near was a guy in India that I had been trying to help. He passed on this 5th try. I let him know that I truly admired his accomplishment and determination. Most of us would have given up long before then. He contacted me after because a proclaimed CISSP at his job had offered to endorse him because kept coming up as invalid in the endorsement process. I gave him the link to check. Sure enough he had been an Associate of ISC2…for 5 years when only have 6 to get the experience. I only saw the printout of that. I did not have his name or member id. I did explain the seriousness of this to the man helping and stressed that this person was not a CISSP and was misrepresenting himself as one. I maybe should have done more in reflection. I do remember telling him that he was going to be a CISSP, and the other guy was not. I did honestly think about offering to endorse him after being lied to like that. Hopefully everyone in the office found out that he was a liar and poser.

Re: The Rise of Fake Candidates in Remote Interviews

akkem — Sat, 12 Apr 2025 15:55:38 GMT

Relying solely on LinkedIn and ISC2 profiles is not an effective way to prevent remote recruiting risks. These profiles can be easily modified to reflect whatever the candidate wants to present at a given time. Additionally, access to ISC2 profiles is limited—not everyone has one, and even LinkedIn doesn’t always reflect the full picture.

A deeper cultural shift is needed in the hiring process—one that goes beyond online profiles to truly validate experience, assess technical and soft skills, and ensure alignment with organizational values.

Re: The Rise of Fake Candidates in Remote Interviews

Spirnia — Sat, 12 Apr 2025 16:05:55 GMT

Agree with needing a deep cultural shift during the hiring process.

Well stated!