<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: New Fortinet RCE flaw in SSL VPN likely exploited in attacks in Threats</title>
    <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Threats/New-Fortinet-RCE-flaw-in-SSL-VPN-likely-exploited-in-attacks/m-p/67111#M1073</link>
    <description>Ouch.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Big issue with these admittedly impressive multi-function god boxes is that it gets harder to cover everything. RCE is a real oversight.</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2024 11:59:35 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Early_Adopter</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-02-10T11:59:35Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>New Fortinet RCE flaw in SSL VPN likely exploited in attacks</title>
      <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Threats/New-Fortinet-RCE-flaw-in-SSL-VPN-likely-exploited-in-attacks/m-p/67108#M1071</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Fortinet is warning that a new critical remote code execution vulnerability in FortiOS&amp;nbsp;SSL VPN is potentially being exploited in attacks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The flaw (tracked as CVE-2024-21762&amp;nbsp;/&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://www.fortiguard.com/psirt/FG-IR-24-015" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;FG-IR-24-015&lt;/A&gt;) received a 9.6 severity rating and is an out-of-bounds write vulnerability in FortiOS&amp;nbsp;that allows&amp;nbsp;unauthenticated attackers to gain remote code execution (RCE) via maliciously crafted requests.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/new-fortinet-rce-flaw-in-ssl-vpn-likely-exploited-in-attacks/" target="_blank"&gt;New Fortinet RCE flaw in SSL VPN likely exploited in attacks (bleepingcomputer.com)&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2024 09:20:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Threats/New-Fortinet-RCE-flaw-in-SSL-VPN-likely-exploited-in-attacks/m-p/67108#M1071</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kyaw_Myo_Oo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-02-10T09:20:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New Fortinet RCE flaw in SSL VPN likely exploited in attacks</title>
      <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Threats/New-Fortinet-RCE-flaw-in-SSL-VPN-likely-exploited-in-attacks/m-p/67111#M1073</link>
      <description>Ouch.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Big issue with these admittedly impressive multi-function god boxes is that it gets harder to cover everything. RCE is a real oversight.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2024 11:59:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Threats/New-Fortinet-RCE-flaw-in-SSL-VPN-likely-exploited-in-attacks/m-p/67111#M1073</guid>
      <dc:creator>Early_Adopter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-02-10T11:59:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New Fortinet RCE flaw in SSL VPN likely exploited in attacks</title>
      <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Threats/New-Fortinet-RCE-flaw-in-SSL-VPN-likely-exploited-in-attacks/m-p/67114#M1074</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for sharing your thoughts and views&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.isc2.org/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/797288093"&gt;@Early_Adopter&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2024 15:02:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Threats/New-Fortinet-RCE-flaw-in-SSL-VPN-likely-exploited-in-attacks/m-p/67114#M1074</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kyaw_Myo_Oo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-02-10T15:02:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

