<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Cybersecurity vs Cyber Resilience in Governance, Risk, Compliance</title>
    <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Governance-Risk-Compliance/Cybersecurity-vs-Cyber-Resilience/m-p/48415#M546</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi All&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The World Economic Forum states that we must move from Cybersecurity to Cyber resilience, an interesting take, since Lloyd's of London, has now opted to reduce the amount of insurance cover for cybersecurity crime, for organisations?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Is this a valid choice, which is ideal, if everyone has the same goals and objectives, but what happens if some organisations are not prepared to move to cyber resilience?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2021/11/why-move-cyber-security-to-cyber-resilience" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2021/11/why-move-cyber-security-to-cyber-resilience&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Caute_Cautim&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2023 10:02:03 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Caute_cautim</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-10-09T10:02:03Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Cybersecurity vs Cyber Resilience</title>
      <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Governance-Risk-Compliance/Cybersecurity-vs-Cyber-Resilience/m-p/48415#M546</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi All&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The World Economic Forum states that we must move from Cybersecurity to Cyber resilience, an interesting take, since Lloyd's of London, has now opted to reduce the amount of insurance cover for cybersecurity crime, for organisations?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Is this a valid choice, which is ideal, if everyone has the same goals and objectives, but what happens if some organisations are not prepared to move to cyber resilience?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2021/11/why-move-cyber-security-to-cyber-resilience" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2021/11/why-move-cyber-security-to-cyber-resilience&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Caute_Cautim&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2023 10:02:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Governance-Risk-Compliance/Cybersecurity-vs-Cyber-Resilience/m-p/48415#M546</guid>
      <dc:creator>Caute_cautim</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-10-09T10:02:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

