<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic CyberSecurity strategy in Governance, Risk, Compliance</title>
    <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Governance-Risk-Compliance/CyberSecurity-strategy/m-p/47603#M485</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;How are Cybersecurity professionals forming their strategy?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It makes a lot of sense to follow lessons learnt, and to have objectives that can be met.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The same issues are clear in other defence avenues.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;We're constantly suffering from being behind and not being able to proactively stop new attacks. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Our strategy needs to put us in the driving seat and do better than just reacting.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;An article i read on military defence listed four aspects of that strategy and i&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;n Cybersecurity terms they could look like this:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Firstly, we need complete freedom of action, and support from the board and senior management&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Second, we should be capable of being on top of most known threats due to protective measures&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Third we should have a good picture of what is happening around us&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;With the first three we should be superior to other systems when applying countermeasures.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;It would be good to exchange views on strategy choices and see how objectives are going to be met.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2023 09:59:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>linzeeb</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-10-09T09:59:04Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>CyberSecurity strategy</title>
      <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Governance-Risk-Compliance/CyberSecurity-strategy/m-p/47603#M485</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;How are Cybersecurity professionals forming their strategy?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It makes a lot of sense to follow lessons learnt, and to have objectives that can be met.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The same issues are clear in other defence avenues.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;We're constantly suffering from being behind and not being able to proactively stop new attacks. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Our strategy needs to put us in the driving seat and do better than just reacting.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;An article i read on military defence listed four aspects of that strategy and i&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;n Cybersecurity terms they could look like this:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Firstly, we need complete freedom of action, and support from the board and senior management&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Second, we should be capable of being on top of most known threats due to protective measures&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Third we should have a good picture of what is happening around us&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;With the first three we should be superior to other systems when applying countermeasures.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;It would be good to exchange views on strategy choices and see how objectives are going to be met.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2023 09:59:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Governance-Risk-Compliance/CyberSecurity-strategy/m-p/47603#M485</guid>
      <dc:creator>linzeeb</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-10-09T09:59:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

