<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Vendor assessment as a SaaS company in Governance, Risk, Compliance</title>
    <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Governance-Risk-Compliance/Vendor-assessment-as-a-SaaS-company/m-p/43553#M325</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your input. I was thinking along similar lines.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2021 07:33:16 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>CISSP-MR</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-02-25T07:33:16Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Vendor assessment as a SaaS company</title>
      <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Governance-Risk-Compliance/Vendor-assessment-as-a-SaaS-company/m-p/43540#M322</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am preparing to start at a new company and I will need to handle Vendor assessment requirements like CAIQ and similar from customers.&lt;BR /&gt;Since all customer data is stored in AWS, can I use the AWS CAIQ as a reference to show that we meet the requirements ?&lt;BR /&gt;Is there anything I should be aware of that could be a pitfall ?&lt;BR /&gt;Where are more resources that can help me ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks !&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2021 19:22:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Governance-Risk-Compliance/Vendor-assessment-as-a-SaaS-company/m-p/43540#M322</guid>
      <dc:creator>CISSP-MR</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-24T19:22:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Vendor assessment as a SaaS company</title>
      <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Governance-Risk-Compliance/Vendor-assessment-as-a-SaaS-company/m-p/43543#M323</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It depends on the customer and their requirements. You can start out with the &lt;STRONG&gt;AWS CAIQ&lt;/STRONG&gt; and &lt;STRONG&gt;AWS SOC&lt;/STRONG&gt; reports and that would probably satisfy most of your customers' requirements. &lt;STRONG&gt;BUT&lt;/STRONG&gt; It doesn't tell the customer about security practices inside of your company though. Hopefully, your new company has an internal security assessment that can be shared with customers with a signed NDA upon request.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2021 20:21:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Governance-Risk-Compliance/Vendor-assessment-as-a-SaaS-company/m-p/43543#M323</guid>
      <dc:creator>tmekelburg1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-24T20:21:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Vendor assessment as a SaaS company</title>
      <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Governance-Risk-Compliance/Vendor-assessment-as-a-SaaS-company/m-p/43546#M324</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Pitfalls? What can go wrong with Cloud security? I'm not a fan of paper assessments. I guess that is because I was always told not only to &lt;STRONG&gt;trust, but verify&lt;/STRONG&gt;. What I use today are several &lt;A href="https://github.com/toniblyx/my-arsenal-of-aws-security-tools" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Open Source tools&lt;/A&gt; to discover misconfigured assets, including an automated assessment of IAM roles. That is the &lt;STRONG&gt;ONLY&lt;/STRONG&gt; way you can be sure you data is safe. Take the technical approach!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-center" image-alt="cloud.png" style="width: 275px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.isc2.org/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/5267iC5A3EC483FC8FE02/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="cloud.png" alt="cloud.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2021 01:35:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Governance-Risk-Compliance/Vendor-assessment-as-a-SaaS-company/m-p/43546#M324</guid>
      <dc:creator>AppDefects</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-25T01:35:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Vendor assessment as a SaaS company</title>
      <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Governance-Risk-Compliance/Vendor-assessment-as-a-SaaS-company/m-p/43553#M325</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your input. I was thinking along similar lines.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2021 07:33:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Governance-Risk-Compliance/Vendor-assessment-as-a-SaaS-company/m-p/43553#M325</guid>
      <dc:creator>CISSP-MR</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-25T07:33:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Vendor assessment as a SaaS company</title>
      <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Governance-Risk-Compliance/Vendor-assessment-as-a-SaaS-company/m-p/43557#M326</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Some customers may ask you to discuss the architecture of what's been built using IaaS or PaaS components.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2021 14:41:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Governance-Risk-Compliance/Vendor-assessment-as-a-SaaS-company/m-p/43557#M326</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steve-Wilme</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-25T14:41:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Vendor assessment as a SaaS company</title>
      <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Governance-Risk-Compliance/Vendor-assessment-as-a-SaaS-company/m-p/43568#M329</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Good Point. I need to verify all the components of the architecture.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2021 08:15:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Governance-Risk-Compliance/Vendor-assessment-as-a-SaaS-company/m-p/43568#M329</guid>
      <dc:creator>CISSP-MR</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-26T08:15:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

