<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Looking at Risk with a new Light in Governance, Risk, Compliance</title>
    <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Governance-Risk-Compliance/Looking-at-Risk-with-a-new-Light/m-p/41205#M189</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Tried finding a link not behind a firewall but the premise is clear enough. One question. What does the governing body consider "lax"?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- b/eads&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2020 22:06:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Beads</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-12-02T22:06:15Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Looking at Risk with a new Light</title>
      <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Governance-Risk-Compliance/Looking-at-Risk-with-a-new-Light/m-p/41203#M188</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi All&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;APRA is the Financial Services arm of the Australian Government - it is a code of practice that all Australian Banks must conform too.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Within New Zealand the equivalent is BS11 governed by the Reserve Bank of New Zealand.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Now what would happen if this happened, that prosecution for being applyin lax cyber security controls occurred, would the rest of the other industries follow this?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.afr.com/companies/financial-services/apra-warns-it-s-ready-to-prosecute-for-lax-cyber-security-20201126-p56i4t?_lrsc=e265b3c8-8396-4cc3-962a-19ff0aa35b58" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.afr.com/companies/financial-services/apra-warns-it-s-ready-to-prosecute-for-lax-cyber-security-20201126-p56i4t?_lrsc=e265b3c8-8396-4cc3-962a-19ff0aa35b58&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Caute_Cautim&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2023 09:42:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Governance-Risk-Compliance/Looking-at-Risk-with-a-new-Light/m-p/41203#M188</guid>
      <dc:creator>Caute_cautim</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-10-09T09:42:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Looking at Risk with a new Light</title>
      <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Governance-Risk-Compliance/Looking-at-Risk-with-a-new-Light/m-p/41205#M189</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Tried finding a link not behind a firewall but the premise is clear enough. One question. What does the governing body consider "lax"?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- b/eads&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2020 22:06:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Governance-Risk-Compliance/Looking-at-Risk-with-a-new-Light/m-p/41205#M189</guid>
      <dc:creator>Beads</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-12-02T22:06:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

