https://community.isc2.org/t5/Privacy/WP-29-Opinion-on-the-Proposed-Regulation-for-the-ePrivacy/m-p/8712#M420 <P>in this <A href="http://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/document.cfm?doc_id=44103" target="_self">opinion</A>, the Working Party notes 4 points of grave concern. With regard to the tracking of the location of terminal equipment; the conditions under which the analysis of content and metadata is allowed; the default settings of terminal equipment and software and with regard to tracking walls the Proposed Regulation would lower the level of protection enjoyed under the GDPR. In this Opinion, the Working Party provides specific suggestions to ensure that the ePrivacy Regulation will guarantee the same, or a higher level of protection appropriate to the sensitive character of communications data (both content and metadata).&nbsp;</P> Mon, 09 Oct 2023 08:44:02 GMT leroux 2023-10-09T08:44:02Z https://community.isc2.org/t5/Privacy/WP-29-Opinion-on-the-Proposed-Regulation-for-the-ePrivacy/m-p/8712#M420 <P>in this <A href="http://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/document.cfm?doc_id=44103" target="_self">opinion</A>, the Working Party notes 4 points of grave concern. With regard to the tracking of the location of terminal equipment; the conditions under which the analysis of content and metadata is allowed; the default settings of terminal equipment and software and with regard to tracking walls the Proposed Regulation would lower the level of protection enjoyed under the GDPR. In this Opinion, the Working Party provides specific suggestions to ensure that the ePrivacy Regulation will guarantee the same, or a higher level of protection appropriate to the sensitive character of communications data (both content and metadata).&nbsp;</P> Mon, 09 Oct 2023 08:44:02 GMT https://community.isc2.org/t5/Privacy/WP-29-Opinion-on-the-Proposed-Regulation-for-the-ePrivacy/m-p/8712#M420 leroux 2023-10-09T08:44:02Z