<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: GDPR and BlockChain-based Businesses in Privacy</title>
    <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Privacy/GDPR-and-BlockChain-based-Businesses/m-p/1259#M26</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Exactly Robert.&amp;nbsp; That's the question.&amp;nbsp; If they *do* store covreed info in the public block chain, it runs smack into the GDPR requirement for "right of erasure."&amp;nbsp; I agre the solution *is* to store such info off block chain.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2017 22:30:52 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jesse_Mundis</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-10-12T22:30:52Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>GDPR and BlockChain-based Businesses</title>
      <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Privacy/GDPR-and-BlockChain-based-Businesses/m-p/1240#M24</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Tooting my own horn, but this is my first European byline.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.cbronline.com/news/enterprise-it/gdpr-mean-blockchain-technologies/" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cbronline.com/news/enterprise-it/gdpr-mean-blockchain-technologies/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My short take on issues of contention between GDPR and blockchain businesses.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jesse&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2023 08:18:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Privacy/GDPR-and-BlockChain-based-Businesses/m-p/1240#M24</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jesse_Mundis</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-10-09T08:18:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: GDPR and BlockChain-based Businesses</title>
      <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Privacy/GDPR-and-BlockChain-based-Businesses/m-p/1248#M25</link>
      <description>It's hard to see who would be liable for violating privacy on a public permissionless blockchain solution.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Most identity proposals emerging for blockchain store identity information of chain. Again the identity owner retains the link.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2017 19:26:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Privacy/GDPR-and-BlockChain-based-Businesses/m-p/1248#M25</guid>
      <dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-10-12T19:26:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: GDPR and BlockChain-based Businesses</title>
      <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Privacy/GDPR-and-BlockChain-based-Businesses/m-p/1259#M26</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Exactly Robert.&amp;nbsp; That's the question.&amp;nbsp; If they *do* store covreed info in the public block chain, it runs smack into the GDPR requirement for "right of erasure."&amp;nbsp; I agre the solution *is* to store such info off block chain.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2017 22:30:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Privacy/GDPR-and-BlockChain-based-Businesses/m-p/1259#M26</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jesse_Mundis</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-10-12T22:30:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

