<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic UK Data Reform Bill in Privacy</title>
    <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Privacy/UK-Data-Reform-Bill/m-p/51608#M1440</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I'd be interested in your views on the UK's new Data Reform Bill - especially around cutting down on cookie consent pop-ups.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-data-laws-to-boost-british-business-protect-consumers-and-seize-the-benefits-of-brexit" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-data-laws-to-boost-british-business-protect-consumers-and-seize-the-benefits-of-brexit&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Will it be good for business and target the real privacy nuisances or will it water down existing privacy laws?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2022 15:40:20 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>RichT</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-06-17T15:40:20Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>UK Data Reform Bill</title>
      <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Privacy/UK-Data-Reform-Bill/m-p/51608#M1440</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'd be interested in your views on the UK's new Data Reform Bill - especially around cutting down on cookie consent pop-ups.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-data-laws-to-boost-british-business-protect-consumers-and-seize-the-benefits-of-brexit" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-data-laws-to-boost-british-business-protect-consumers-and-seize-the-benefits-of-brexit&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Will it be good for business and target the real privacy nuisances or will it water down existing privacy laws?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2022 15:40:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Privacy/UK-Data-Reform-Bill/m-p/51608#M1440</guid>
      <dc:creator>RichT</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-06-17T15:40:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: UK Data Reform Bill</title>
      <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Privacy/UK-Data-Reform-Bill/m-p/51635#M1445</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;GDRP and DPA18 do not require organisations 'recruit' a DPO.&amp;nbsp; That implies that the DPO must be an employee, whereas as external can be an external party contracted to a number of organisations.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Having the ICO report to parliament as suggested in the bill, could result in the regulator becoming politically influenced rather than independent from the party in government.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The bill also proposes removal of rights, such as, for a legitimate interests assessment being required for the processing of data on minors and the right to object to purely automated decision making.&amp;nbsp; Given the known biases in ML/AI driven decision making this has the potential to result in unfair discrimination.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The New Office for Digital Identities and Attributes in the DCMS sound like a national id scheme via the backdoor.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2022 14:29:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Privacy/UK-Data-Reform-Bill/m-p/51635#M1445</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steve-Wilme</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-06-20T14:29:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

