<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Facial Recognition software laws. in Privacy</title>
    <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Privacy/Facial-Recognition-software-laws/m-p/51583#M1437</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Illinois here in the US has set the standard for biometrics since 2003. I don't usually have a great deal of respect for Springfield but have to give credit where credit is due. This is a very stringent law and the baseline for the US biometrics country wide.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://law.justia.com/codes/illinois/2013/chapter-740/act-740-ilcs-14/" target="_blank"&gt;https://law.justia.com/codes/illinois/2013/chapter-740/act-740-ilcs-14/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- B/Eads&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2022 13:44:24 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Beads</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-06-16T13:44:24Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Facial Recognition software laws.</title>
      <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Privacy/Facial-Recognition-software-laws/m-p/51580#M1436</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Tech and human rights experts have renewed&amp;nbsp;calls for a national&amp;nbsp;framework on the use of&amp;nbsp;facial recognition technology, as one described it as the "wild west of the digital world".&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;It's technology Australians use every day when unlocking their smartphones, but might not realise is in places they don't expect.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The article was written based on Australia not having laws in place but how many companies do.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-06-16/nsw-facial-recognition-technology-wild-west-kmart-good-guys/101156010" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-06-16/nsw-facial-recognition-technology-wild-west-kmart-good-guys/101156010&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;What do folks think about laws around this?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;d&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2022 05:44:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Privacy/Facial-Recognition-software-laws/m-p/51580#M1436</guid>
      <dc:creator>dcontesti</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-06-16T05:44:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Facial Recognition software laws.</title>
      <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Privacy/Facial-Recognition-software-laws/m-p/51583#M1437</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Illinois here in the US has set the standard for biometrics since 2003. I don't usually have a great deal of respect for Springfield but have to give credit where credit is due. This is a very stringent law and the baseline for the US biometrics country wide.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://law.justia.com/codes/illinois/2013/chapter-740/act-740-ilcs-14/" target="_blank"&gt;https://law.justia.com/codes/illinois/2013/chapter-740/act-740-ilcs-14/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- B/Eads&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2022 13:44:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Privacy/Facial-Recognition-software-laws/m-p/51583#M1437</guid>
      <dc:creator>Beads</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-06-16T13:44:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

