<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic CISSP Associate or SSCP in Exams</title>
    <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Exams/CISSP-Associate-or-SSCP/m-p/2466#M324</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just finished a masters degree in infosec, with no direct infosec experience but plenty of related experience. ISC(2)&amp;nbsp;suggest I take the SSCP as my masters would mean I dont need any industry experience, but&amp;nbsp;looking at the test questions think I could take the CISSP exam with a bit of extra work. Whilst I wouldnt have the experience for a full CISSP I could still get the Associate. From what I can tell&amp;nbsp;ISC2 intend for someone like me to do the SSCP first but it also seems like&amp;nbsp;more&amp;nbsp;HR people have heard of CISSP and its more respectable. I understand the intended path of SSCP then CISSP and that they're meant to be for different people in different job roles etc&amp;nbsp;but also that some companies I have spoken to&amp;nbsp;prefer anything to do with&amp;nbsp;CISSP as its better known. Therefore my question is... which is a better path, getting the Associate&amp;nbsp;from the&amp;nbsp;cissp exam or first getting the full SSCP. If time and money was no object I could&amp;nbsp;work towards&amp;nbsp;both, but unfortunately it is. Im not trying to achieve anything in particular at this stage, just make the most of my study&amp;nbsp;for the future.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2017 08:16:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>tomturner</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-10-31T08:16:15Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>CISSP Associate or SSCP</title>
      <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Exams/CISSP-Associate-or-SSCP/m-p/2466#M324</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just finished a masters degree in infosec, with no direct infosec experience but plenty of related experience. ISC(2)&amp;nbsp;suggest I take the SSCP as my masters would mean I dont need any industry experience, but&amp;nbsp;looking at the test questions think I could take the CISSP exam with a bit of extra work. Whilst I wouldnt have the experience for a full CISSP I could still get the Associate. From what I can tell&amp;nbsp;ISC2 intend for someone like me to do the SSCP first but it also seems like&amp;nbsp;more&amp;nbsp;HR people have heard of CISSP and its more respectable. I understand the intended path of SSCP then CISSP and that they're meant to be for different people in different job roles etc&amp;nbsp;but also that some companies I have spoken to&amp;nbsp;prefer anything to do with&amp;nbsp;CISSP as its better known. Therefore my question is... which is a better path, getting the Associate&amp;nbsp;from the&amp;nbsp;cissp exam or first getting the full SSCP. If time and money was no object I could&amp;nbsp;work towards&amp;nbsp;both, but unfortunately it is. Im not trying to achieve anything in particular at this stage, just make the most of my study&amp;nbsp;for the future.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2017 08:16:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Exams/CISSP-Associate-or-SSCP/m-p/2466#M324</guid>
      <dc:creator>tomturner</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-10-31T08:16:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

