<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: General Data Protection Regulation ( GDPR) Material in Chapters</title>
    <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Chapters/General-Data-Protection-Regulation-GDPR-Material/m-p/20133#M362</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;The Future of Privacy Forum, and many others like Baker Law, have published guides that compare GDPR and California Consumer Protection Act (CCPA) (SB-1121) in terms of scope, definitions, legal basis, rights, and enforcement.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I tend to focus on the provisions and privacy-preserving technical controls surrounding data subject/consumer "rights". For example take the requirement for "pseudonymization" (i.e., ensuring that PII cannot be attributable to a data subject/consumer). The big difference between the laws are that under GDPR an organization must have the technical ability to re-identify a data subject to comply with other data subject rights provisions. Under CCPA though, there must not be an ability to re-identify PII after the data has been pseudonymized. All of this comparison stuff is nice, but technical implementations are what matter, so I would be curious to see what (ISC)2 publishes as implementation guidance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://fpf.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/GDPR_CCPA_Comparison-Guide.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;https://fpf.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/GDPR_CCPA_Comparison-Guide.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.bakerlaw.com/webfiles/Privacy/2018/Articles/CCPA-GDPR-Chart.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.bakerlaw.com/webfiles/Privacy/2018/Articles/CCPA-GDPR-Chart.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2019 17:52:58 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>AppDefects</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-14T17:52:58Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>General Data Protection Regulation ( GDPR) Material</title>
      <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Chapters/General-Data-Protection-Regulation-GDPR-Material/m-p/20121#M361</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The (ISC)² GDPR has developed some educational material targeted to CISSP which can be used freely by (ISC)² Chapters&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;an&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="http://blog.isc2.org/files/getting-started-on-the-basics-the-eu-general-data-protection-regulation-gdpr.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;overview of the basics&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;that can be used as a tool to help everyone understand and communicate the scope of what is required.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://blog.isc2.org/files/scoping-the-compliance-task-for-gdpr---areas-of-activity.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;“Scoping the Compliance Task for GDPR : 12 Areas of Activity”&lt;/A&gt; which offer a guide for scoping the task ahead of the GDPR Implementation and communicating requirements for all stakeholders&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;We have different slide sets&amp;nbsp; upon the GDPR implementation according to the targeted audience We have currently done more than 12 sessions.&amp;nbsp; (slides available upon request)&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have started to work upon the relationship between GDPR and CCPA for an implementer&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2023 09:09:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Chapters/General-Data-Protection-Regulation-GDPR-Material/m-p/20121#M361</guid>
      <dc:creator>leroux</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-10-09T09:09:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: General Data Protection Regulation ( GDPR) Material</title>
      <link>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Chapters/General-Data-Protection-Regulation-GDPR-Material/m-p/20133#M362</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The Future of Privacy Forum, and many others like Baker Law, have published guides that compare GDPR and California Consumer Protection Act (CCPA) (SB-1121) in terms of scope, definitions, legal basis, rights, and enforcement.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I tend to focus on the provisions and privacy-preserving technical controls surrounding data subject/consumer "rights". For example take the requirement for "pseudonymization" (i.e., ensuring that PII cannot be attributable to a data subject/consumer). The big difference between the laws are that under GDPR an organization must have the technical ability to re-identify a data subject to comply with other data subject rights provisions. Under CCPA though, there must not be an ability to re-identify PII after the data has been pseudonymized. All of this comparison stuff is nice, but technical implementations are what matter, so I would be curious to see what (ISC)2 publishes as implementation guidance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://fpf.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/GDPR_CCPA_Comparison-Guide.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;https://fpf.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/GDPR_CCPA_Comparison-Guide.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.bakerlaw.com/webfiles/Privacy/2018/Articles/CCPA-GDPR-Chart.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.bakerlaw.com/webfiles/Privacy/2018/Articles/CCPA-GDPR-Chart.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2019 17:52:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.isc2.org/t5/Chapters/General-Data-Protection-Regulation-GDPR-Material/m-p/20133#M362</guid>
      <dc:creator>AppDefects</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-14T17:52:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

